Categories
Commentary

Foreshocks

Good Morning! I hope you are having a good start to the week. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

There is lots of buzz around bubbles and euphoria.

Since late 2022, the Nasdaq 100 has increased by ~75%, and the S&P 500 has increased by ~50%. However, there were some bumps along the way. In mid-to-late 2023, people got worried about the economy, which boosted interest rates. But in November 2023, investors discovered the government would issue less debt, decreasing interest rates. This was good news because future profits are more valuable now when interest rates drop (i.e., lower discount rates elevate the present value of future cash flows), so stocks tend to rise.

The general idea is that stocks will likely keep rising because of the promise of AI and expected profits growing faster than stock prices. Also, people think this will happen as the economy grows and inflation decreases. But it’s not just those factors. How people invest right now is also a big reason why stocks may increase.

Much Further To Run?

The primary catalyst lies in the imbalance of investor positioning stemming from the aftermath of ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy), Fallacy Alarm elaborates. The conclusion of ZIRP reintroduced fixed-income securities as viable investments, prompting investors to boost their fixed-income allocations significantly in recent times.

Further asset rotation could manifest through a stagnant or declining stock market coupled with rising yields or through a robust stock market alongside stagnant or falling yields.

Accordingly, investors are now pursuing stocks at seemingly elevated valuations.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America via Bloomberg.

Fallacy Alarm adds color, making an interesting point on elevated valuations.

Bubbles (the hot topic) are not solely about prices; the collective portfolio allocation characterizes them. We dive further, finding there is room to expand. Per Bloomberg’s John Authers, the market is not as absurd, with the Magnificent Seven aligning more closely with the broader market than before.

Graphic: Retrieved from Ray Dalio.

Additionally, Authers says that the S&P 500 remains relatively inexpensive, with room to go based on global liquidity, subdued margin debt levels, and not overly elevated single-stock call option volumes.

Graphic: Retrieved from Ray Dalio.

“The S&P 500 looks extended in absolute terms when measured by US domestic liquidity flows, but it looks far more comfortably placed when Global Liquidity is the benchmark,” CrossBorder Capital’s Mike Howell states. “US equities have got much further to run if we can reassure ourselves that Wall Street has become the ‘World market’ for stocks. Indeed, this might be plausible given the dominance of US firms in tech and AI applications?”

Graphic: Retrieved from CrossBorder Capital via Bloomberg.

Embedded Risks To Rally

Some others are more cautious regarding the options volumes.

Nomura’s Charlie McElligott suggests the fear of a “crash up” causes a steeper call skew (i.e., the asymmetry in implied volatility levels across different strike prices). We see this with the positive relationship between spot prices and implied volatility. Additionally, volatility selling and structured product issuance may present risky dislocations.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

Some experts, like QVR Advisors, agree, note that selling volatility doesn’t offer the same returns with less risk as it used to. Instead, it’s now seen as taking on more risk for lower returns.

Graphic: Retrieved from QVR Advisors.

Options Volatility And Pricing

SpotGamma acknowledges these trends and dislocations can persist for some time.

So, what do we do about that?

In last week’s detailed “BOXXing For Beginners” letter, we discussed getting selective and trading soaring stocks using creative options structures. Remaining faithful to our approach, we traded Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) throughout the past week, utilizing a steep call skew to play upside potential at lower costs.

The outcomes for one of our accounts are detailed below.

Most positions were opened with modest credits and gradually closed with larger ones following news of its upcoming inclusion in the S&P 500. A significant portion of the profits were captured when the value of the 8 MAR 24 series reached its peak on Monday morning. During such moments, especially when nearing expiry, it’s crucial to pay attention to the market, closely monitoring the responsiveness of the spreads to underlying price action. When this responsiveness slipped in the morning, we closed all the positions, timing the peak on the structures at ~$5.00.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

Managing ‘Greeks’ Versus ‘PnL’

When it is that late, as it was in the above trade, you are more focused on managing the PnL (i.e., profit and loss) and not Greek risk (i.e., the set of risk measures used to assess the sensitivity of option prices to changes in various factors, such as underlying asset price or delta, time decay or theta, volatility or vega, and interest rates or rho).

Accordingly, despite SMCI moving higher, the same spreads traded at a ~90% discount per late-Monday pricing. On Tuesday, that discount lessened to ~60%. Regardless, the right decision was to roll into similar, albeit wider, structures in anticipation of that same index effect that drove shares of Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) higher in 2020 with its inclusion in the S&P 500.

Graphic: Retrieved from Physik Invest.

When trading these high-flying stocks, the level of risk often hinges on your exposure to vega. This risk can be mitigated by widening the gap between the closer long (+1) and farther away short (-2) options strikes. 

Here’s the rationale.

As the underlying asset moves along its skew curve, the impact of volatility on delta shifts, driven by increased implied volatility from options demand. Events, such as the market decline in 2020 and the meme stock frenzy in 2021, have illustrated how the implied volatility of out-of-the-money options can spike significantly more than the underlying asset’s movement.

Option exposures can exacerbate volatile situations through covering and hedging activities—a squeeze can occur caused by substantial movements and dramatic increases in options prices.

As mentioned last week, a straightforward method to assess the safety of such trades is by examining the pricing of fully in-the-money spreads. If these spreads trade at large credits to close, they are worth considering. Conversely, if the spreads require a debit to close, it’s advisable to steer clear. For those focused on the Greeks, aim for flat or positive exposure to vega.

Conclusions

In any case, the moral is as follows: many seem to be turning optimistic and raising their expectations while some pockets of irrationality, albeit not extreme, are popping up.

Sure, stocks may be cheap and not in a bubble to some, with added support coming from investors (re)positioning, earnings growth, and falling inflation, but there are slight shifts that may draw concern.

Such slight shifts can include the flattening of call skew, foreshadowing a waning appetite for risk, and potentially heralding market softness. Additionally, SpotGamma’s Brent Kochuba has shared data that points to lower correlations aligning with interim stock market highs, presenting more cause for caution.

While the allure of record highs may be enticing, we look to lock in some inflation protection as shared last week, participate in the upside creatively, be that in metals or high-flying stocks, and hedge using similarly creative structures on the downside, albeit much wider and with protection (e.g., Long Put Butterfly), and favorable Greeks (-delta, +gamma, +vega). There are many more details to add, but we will finish here to publish the newsletter as soon as possible. Cheers!

Graphic: Retrieved from DATATREK via Barchart. The current market conditions, again, don’t indicate a bubble.
Categories
Commentary

BOXXing For Beginners

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) beat on earnings last week, lifting the entire stock market.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Christian Fromhertz.

The chipmaker confirms it can meet lofty expectations fueled by the artificial intelligence boom, with demand for Nvidia’s newest products likely to outpace supply throughout the year. Despite mounting competition and regulatory challenges in markets like China, Nvidia pursues strategic partnerships to expand its distribution channels.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via @Marlin_Capital. NVDA eclipses $2T market capitalization, with its 12-month forward PE now at 33.

Before the earnings announcement, heightened implied volatility derived from options prices on the chipmaker’s stock indicated anticipation of significant fluctuations. The at-the-money straddles, composed of call and put options, suggested movement expectations of as much as +/-10% after earnings.

Various methods exist to estimate the expected move. One approach involves taking the value of the at-the-money straddle for the front month and multiplying it by 85%. Another entails using a narrow range of options.

The volatility skew, which will be defined later, implied that the perceived risk of movement was tilted toward the upside. In any case, staying within the anticipated movement would not favor options buyers, as we show later.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Since late 2023, traders have increasingly been hedging against or speculating on market upswings. This is evident in the higher call option implied volatility. Expectations for significant upward movement are particularly notable in the growing number of stocks where the 25 delta call implied volatility exceeds the 25 delta put implied volatility, shares Henry Schwartz of Cboe Global Markets.

To elaborate, options delta (∆) measures the change in an option’s price relative to changes in the underlying asset’s price. It indicates the option’s sensitivity to the underlying asset’s price movements. A delta of 0.50 means that for every $1 change in the underlying asset’s price, the option’s price would change by $0.50 in the same direction. The skew reflects the difference in implied volatility between out-of-the-money call and put options with the same delta. 

When the 25 delta call implied volatility surpasses that of the 25 delta put implied volatility, a more pronounced positive skew suggests traders are willing to pay a premium for calls. Conversely, if the 25 delta put implied volatility exceeds that of the 25 delta call implied volatility, often observed in products like the S&P 500 (due to concerns about protecting equity downside), there is a negative skew or stronger inclination to pay a higher price for put options.

Graphic: Retrieved from Henry Schwartz.

This persistent fear of missing out on sudden upward movements manifests a cascading effect when markets move higher, says Nomura Americas Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott.

“The key to equities seemingly being able to keep shaking off nascent pullbacks? Well outside of the ongoing ‘AI  euphoria’ theme and de-grossing of shorts, … it’s been all about the Pavlovian ‘options selling’ flows, which continue to suppress [implied volatility].”

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura.

As explained by McElligott, these “options selling flows” have the potential to amplify momentum. For instance, when traders or customers purchase call spreads, as they are large, the counterparties or dealers are left with a short skew, negative delta position that loses money if implied volatility rises or markets rise. In response to a rising market, dealers may manage their delta by selling put options or buying call options, stocks, or futures. Adding these positive delta hedges helps propel the market into uncharted territory during swift movements.

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura.

As validation, after Nvidia Corporation’s stock surged about 10% post-earnings, Bloomberg reported that “to fully re-hedge all open option positions coming into the day, 51 million shares, or 91% of the daily average,” would need to be traded. Bloomberg added that the March 15 $680 call, February 23 $700, and $750 calls experienced the most significant changes in the delta before the market opening.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Global_Macro or @Marcomadness2.

Observing SpotGamma’s real-time options hedging impact measure HIRO, the chipmaker was boosted partly on positive flows from the hedging of call options, as shown by the orange line below, while put options trading had a limited effect, as indicated by the blue line. The re-hedging activity positively affected the stock on Thursday post-earnings and had a pressuring effect on Friday, owing to the short-datedness of some of the options exposure traders initiated.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. 

While mentioning pressures, see below the volatility skew before (green) and after (grey) earnings. 

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

Short-dated options with very high strikes (e.g., 900+) and close expiration dates (e.g., ten days) struggled to hold their value. SpotGamma shared that the pricing of near-the-money $785 calls expiring on March 15 returned to their previous levels just a week before earnings. Since the actual movement closely matched the expected movement, there was little justification for options well above the market (i.e., +30%) to retain their value.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via SpotGamma.

At Physik Invest, we foresaw such a situation and executed 100-point wide 1×2 call ratio spreads between the 900s and 1000s for a credit of approximately 0.90. We closed these positions the next day for an additional credit of 0.50 when the 1000 strike options failed to keep their value as good as the closer 900 strike options. The resulting profit was a 1.40 credit per spread.

Graphic: Via Banco Santander SA (NYSE: SAN) research. The return profile, at expiry, of a 1×2 (buy 1 and sell 2 further away) ratio spread.

Please be aware that similar trades are present in other high-flying products, albeit less widespread than in 2021 during the meme-stock trend. A simple way to determine whether such trades are safe is to check the pricing of fully in-the-money spreads. If the spreads trade at substantial credits to close, they are worth considering. However, if the spreads require a debit to close, it’s best to avoid them. In the case of Nvidia, the 100-point spread was priced at 25.00 in credit to close the day of earnings.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

Generally speaking, this trend in implied volatility is something that may continue. Kris Sidial from The Ambrus Group says the trend, which masks the risks of short volatility under the hood, such as those tied to risk-management practices, is driven by several factors not limited to the following:

(1) Increased demand for call options.

(2) Larger institutions seeking volatility as a hedge against rising risk exposure as the S&P 500 climbs. 

(3) Significant market movements make it difficult for implied volatility to decrease significantly.

Must Read: Two Major Risks Investors Should Watch Out For

Graphic: Retrieved from The Ambrus Group.

As such, Sidial suggests that “there is significant value in embracing volatility in both directions,” hedging against geopolitical and economic uncertainties while also capitalizing on the market upside. As discussed last week, we focus on leveraging elevated skew to reduce the cost of bullish trades (e.g., metals). Additionally, we plan to replenish our long put skew by acquiring put spreads in equities as a precaution against potential risks ahead, mainly local market peaks this time of year.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Tavi Costa.

With recent data dissuading anticipated cuts, there’s room to safeguard cash at higher rates for longer. 

One trade structure to help us do so is the box spread, which includes benefits such as a convenience yield, capital efficiencies achieved through portfolio margining, easy entry/exit on an exchange through most retail brokers, and potential 60% long-term and 40% short-term tax treatment.

Graphic: Retrieved via Alpha Architect. 

Like a Treasury bill, the loan structure combines a bull call spread and a bear put spread. In a bull call spread, an investor purchases a call option and sells another at a higher strike price. A bear put spread involves buying a put option and selling another at a lower strike price. The lower (X1) and higher strikes (X2) match for a box spread, with all legs sharing the same expiration date.

Graphic: Retrieved from OCC.

In calculating the loan rate, we take, for example, a recent box spread trade of Physik Invest’s: BOT +1 IRON CONDOR SPX 100 (Quarterlys) 31 DEC 24 3000/6000/6000/3000 CALL/PUT @2867.90 CBOE.

[(WIDTH−PRICE)/Price](365/DTE) = Implied Interest Rate

Where:

WIDTH: Distance between higher and lower strikes

PRICE: The price of the box spread

DTE: Days until the trade matures

[(3000-2867.90)/2867.90](365/319) = 0.0527036866 = 5.27%

We lend $286,790.00, at a risk-free rate of 5.27%, in exchange for $13,210.00 of interest at maturity. You can track box spread yields more quickly using tools like boxtrades.com. Such insights open up several strategic avenues for traders.

One approach is investing about 95% of your cash into box spreads to return the principal at maturity, risking the 5% interest you make on trades with a limited downside (e.g., SPX bull call spread). 

A more preferable option exists for portfolio margin traders. Portfolio margining is a risk-based approach to determining margin requirements in a customer’s account, aligning collateral with the overall portfolio risk. Portfolio margining considers offsets between correlated products, calculating margin requirements based on projected losses. This approach may lower margin requirements, allowing for more efficient capital utilization.

As portfolio margin traders, we retain our buying power due to the minimal directional risk associated with box spreads, allocating it to other margin-intensive trades. To illustrate, if such a trader initially invests $100,000 in box spreads, they are left with $0 in cash and $100,000 in buying power available for margin-intensive trades (e.g., synthetic long stock or the purchase of an at-the-money call and simultaneous sale of an at-the-money put). You get your inflation protection while participating 100% in up-and-down market movements. Why not, right?

The point of the above passage is that much of what you see online can be done yourself in a tax, margin, and cost-efficient way. Alternatively, you can be hands-off, investing in money markets and CDs or complicated yet cool products like the popularized Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BATS: BOXX), which has grabbed attention for its tax arbitrage through complex strategies and loopholes.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Eric Balchunas.

With BOXX, you’re investing in something as safe as short-term Treasury bills, but you can get your money back anytime and enjoy better tax treatment than Treasury bills. Bloomberg’s Matt Levine has an excellent write-up on the mechanics of BOXX, which you can read here.

We digress. You can do more with your unused cash and buying power when following the methods outlined earlier and as we put well in our “Investing In A High Rate World” report published in April 2023. There, we discussed return stacking utilizing Nasdaq call ratio spreads and S&P 500 box spreads, two trades that continue to kill it this year.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bespoke Investment Group.

We choose these structures, which have limited losses in case of market downside, for the following reasons: There is considerable support for the market, but this support appears fragile. For one, we refer to record-level dispersion trading, which involves the sale of index options and buying options in individual stocks. 

It’s the same short volatility exposure Sidial has warned us about. With some stocks realizing substantial differences in movement from the index, this booming trade may have gone too far, setting the stage for a potential market reversal.

The situation resembles the period leading up to Volmageddon when short-volatility strategies backfired. Implied correlations are low, and if a market shock occurs, investors may be forced to close out their trades, which could feed volatility. As was in the case leading up to Volmageddon, however, volatility can cluster and mean-revert for longer.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Tallbacken Capital Advisors.

.

Categories
Commentary

Reversion To The Meme

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

After a period of taking the stairs up, markets took the elevator down last week. Through Tuesday, the S&P 500 fell over 2.5% on a Consumer Price Index (CPI) print, which signaled higher-than-expected inflation. Internally, the selling was heavy.

Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView. Market Internals as taught by Shadowtrader’s Peter Reznicek.

Additionally, options were repriced in a big way.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Options Insight.

Let’s digress. 

Recall that options implied volatility is a measure of the market’s expectation of the future volatility of an underlying asset, as reflected by the supply and demand of options themselves. Higher implied volatility indicates more significant expected price fluctuations.

Options implied volatility skew refers to the unevenness in implied volatility levels across different strike prices. Steep, smile-looking, or v-shaped volatility skew reflects a scenario where increased market volatility disproportionately impacts farther away strike options due to (expected) losses from more frequent delta rebalancing in a moving market. Options traders assign higher implied volatility to those farther away strike options to compensate for increased risk/cost, often enabling savvy traders to exploit these variations to reduce their hedging costs.

Moreover, before last week’s drop, the S&P 500’s implied volatility skew was subdued, as indicated by the grey-shaded area below. Tuesday’s decline coincided with increased options trading activity and demand, leading to a notable upward shift in skew. Distant S&P 500 put options experienced significant increases in implied volatility (see the below grey line moving away from the shaded area).

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Volatility skew for S&P 500 options expiring March 15, 2024.

Though skew remains elevated, broader implied volatility measures, such as the Cboe Volatility Index or VIX, declined as rapidly as markets rallied in the days following Tuesday’s downturn.

What’s happening?

Despite further negative economic indicators, such as hot producer prices or weaker retail sales and manufacturing output, markets surged strongly, closing the week almost unchanged. Beyond significant investor inflows into stocks, totaling approximately $16 billion on Wednesday, according to Bank of America Corporation, analysis of S&P options positioning revealed mechanical demand for the S&P 500, as highlighted by SqueezeMetrics. Higher implied volatility strengthened an automatic buying mechanism, supporting markets.

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics. Dealer S&P 500 Vanna Exposure or VEX.

This phenomenon is partially attributed to the significant options selling discussed in our recent newsletters, acknowledging the warnings issued by Cem Karsan of Kai Volatility and Kris Sidial of The Ambrus Group. Essentially, there’s been a rush among options sellers to enter into sizable positions, exemplified by the substantial options selling activity observed last week. UBS Group highlighted the persistence of this concerning toxic flow, noting aggressive trader actions, such as the sale of “70K of Thursday expiry 4120 puts at 0.05 on Wednesday.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

The estimated risk profile of this position is provided below (please allow for a margin of error of a day or two due to expiry). Essentially, it’s unfavorable, with the option seller at risk of losing much money if the market drops or implied volatility increases. Please be aware that we’re assessing this position independently, without knowledge of the option seller’s overall portfolio, including potential risk offsets from other positions they may hold.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform using the Analyze function.

Customers favoring such positive delta “short skew” positions prompt dealers on the other side to assume a negative delta (i.e., make money if the market is lower or implied volatility is higher) “long skew” or “long options” position, which they may manage through the sale of put options or the purchase of call options, underlying stock shares, or futures for hedging purposes. For a deeper understanding of these mechanisms, refer to SqueezeMetrics’ paper, “The Implied Order Book.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics.

This all happened during a seasonally weak period. We’ll go past the positioning side of things in a moment, so bear with me, but you can see the drop-off in options deltas following mid-February below.

Graphic: Retrieved from ConvexValue.

In essence, despite the anticipated reduction in options-based support, which Cem Karsan describes as a “window of non-strength” or a scenario conducive to increased volatility, the market’s reaction to Tuesday’s drop stemmed volatility. Observing these dynamics in real-time, here’s how we responded.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

We had proactively positioned ourselves for a potentially weaker February, capitalizing on overlooked hedge opportunities outlined in recent newsletters—specifically, put spreads like butterflies. Others did similar, with Nomura Americas Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott noting increased buying of put butterfly spreads in recent weeks (please see our late January and early February letters).

Depending on their setup (including the distance between strikes, the distance from the spot price, and the expiration timeframe), these spreads were positioned to profit from market declines. When the drop occurred, the unbalanced, very far out-of-the-money structures were priced to be closed at a small debit loss when the skew elevated substantially. Utilizing real-time analysis, we concluded it was opportune to increase our exposure to these far out-of-the-money units, capitalizing on the surge in implied volatility while cashing in on the closer spreads priced for a credit profit.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

As markets recovered, we closed the recently initiated riskier spreads, freeing up buying power for opportunities elsewhere, such as in NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI), where a significant volatility skew, driven by heightened call options trading, enabled us to generate credit from short-dated spread trades.

By Friday’s end, we achieved one of our most successful weeks of the year, boosting our confidence and reinforcing our patience with underperforming trades, like the put butterfly hedges. PAY-tience!

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

What motivated our actions? Let’s elaborate.

Tactically, we favor owning options to express our opinions efficiently selling options further out to reduce costs. Occasionally, we will utilize a ratio, such as selling two options for every one purchased. For those less experienced, simplicity often proves effective. Consider straightforward approaches like purchasing a wide put vertical, entailing buying a put, and selling a put at some greater distance. Depending on your position, the returns may come in at multiples of each unit of risk undertaken.

Furthermore, the speculative trading and crowded positions in equities (as previously discussed in this and prior newsletters), along with the persistent volatility skew (as indicated by the yellow line compared to the grey line below), imply that hedging strategies (such as owning longer-dated calls and selling stock/futures as a combination, or using put option spread strategies to hedge shares) may continue to be appealing.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Volatility skew for S&P 500 options expiring March 15, 2024.

In terms of what to hedge, as highlighted by Fallacy Alarm, mid-February traditionally signals local market peaks due to significant cash injections followed by selling pressure to cover tax obligations. Additionally, a dilemma presents itself: should the focus be on combating inflation or stimulating growth? Presently, the data would dissuade anticipated rate cuts, though such actions might be contemplated if the Personal Consumption Expenditure, a key metric, points to lower price increases, particularly in services. Current interest rate projections suggest a bimodal scenario with a low probability of sudden rate declines.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

As further context, John Authers of Bloomberg says there remains a risk of overheating or a scenario where the economy remains robust, eventually forcing the Federal Reserve (Fed) to tighten policies until it precipitates a recession. This is in disagreement with TS Lombard. They question whether the Fed’s current stance is overly restrictive, while Bob Elliott of Unlimited Funds suggests that rates may decrease in response to slowing growth. Eventually, the persistent inflation stemming from structural factors could prompt subsequent rate hikes driven by increased funding needs.

Graphic: Retrieved from Sven Henrich.

Traders must remain vigilant, adopting strategic approaches to hedge exuberance and so-called windows of non-strength. Should there be “a stronger catalyst than a telegraphed CPI print,” says Kris Sidial, then “both tails and skew are likely to perform well,” with any rally, given the short-volatility, likely to unsettle positioning, leading dealers to boost momentum and whipsaw. In other words, much lower or higher markets, coupled with more demand for puts or calls respectively, means dealers take on more short volatility risk, which they adjust for by repricing options higher and hedging with underlying asset sales (in the case of puts) or purchases (in the case of calls).

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Corporation.

In conclusion, we remain mindful that it’s an election year, which could lead to heightened monetary and fiscal support in response to any weaknesses. While we maintain a positive outlook over the long term, we’re less optimistic in the short term.

This week, our attention is directed toward protecting our cash by rolling our remaining S&P 500 box spreads (acting as synthetic T-bills without impacting our buying power). We aim to secure these interest rates, keep a close watch on high-performing assets like silver, and replenish our long put skew (i.e., purchasing put spreads) in equities to hedge against potential vulnerabilities ahead. Following earnings announcements, we may resume engagement with companies such as Nvidia.

Graphic: Example of trade structuring. Retrieved from Physik Invest. This does not accurately represent this newsletter writer’s position. However, it is close. Note that one may own stock on top of this and view positions in aggregate.

If you’re wondering what’s up with the newsletter formatting over the past weeks, we are trying stuff. Let us know what you like and don’t like. Cheers, and have a good week! And, finally, if you can, share!

The cover photo was retrieved from a RidgeHaven Capital post on Seeking Alpha.

Categories
Commentary

Bubblicious

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Optimism from earnings growth among large stocks overshadows concerns about instability abroadquarterly debt sales, and the diminishing likelihood of an immediate interest rate cut.

“The U.S. is doing pretty well,” Yardeni Research founder Ed Yardeni remarks, noting a shift from speculation about interest rates allows the market to focus on fundamentals. “Right now, the fundamentals are good for the economy. And, there’s plenty of hype around about.”

Multiple rate cuts totaling nearly 125 basis points in the next year remain expected. This seems extreme unless there’s a market crash, says Harley Bassman, inventor of the MOVE Index measuring bond market volatility. Bassman believes current pricing reflects a bimodal scenario, with an 85% chance rates remain stable and a 15% chance they drop to 1%. Combining these probabilities, the market arrives at the anticipated cuts by year-end.

Naturally, markets are cyclical, moving from one extreme to another. Despite the fundamentals being in order, a lack of broad participation is evident in the more significant number of declining stocks than advancing ones. This situation, resembling patterns seen during the late ‘90s infotech-and-telecom boom, is frequently an indicator of less resilient future returns.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Global Research.

Ryan Detrick of Carson Group notes that February typically experiences less momentum than January, often due to reinvestment and bonus inflows. Data shows that when the S&P 500 recorded a 20% gain for the year, February tended to underperform, especially in the latter half of the month, which typically marked the weakest two-week period of the year.

Graphic: Retrieved from SentimenTrader via Jason Goepfert.

While the same volatility-suppressing trades detailed in last week’s letter continue to support markets where they are ceteris paribus (where customers sell volatility, and dealers hedge by buying stock/futures during declines and selling during strength), there has been “SPX/SPY downside buying (put flys) and ongoing VIX call buying,” Nomura Americas Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott writes. This steepens implied volatility skew, benefitting the underappreciated hedge opportunities shared in Physik Invest’s Market Intelligence letters.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma on February 5, 2024.

The recent repricing has allowed unbalanced, out-of-the-money options spreads to retain their value better amid ongoing market gains. The focus has shifted from worries about missed opportunities to safeguarding against potential downturns. This shift may be attributed to concerns beyond poor market breadth and the possibility of localized issues in places like China impacting global markets. These include geopolitical tensionsturbulence in specific capital market segments, lingering effects of extensive government spending, and looming debt crises.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma on February 1, 2024.

With the popularity of yield-enhancing trades like selling options, there’s concern that if significant market movements materialize, a greater share of end users will shift to buying options, indirectly exacerbating market volatility and downside.

Graphic: Retrieved from QVR Advisors.

To explain this phenomenon, we start with the options delta, which measures how much an option’s price will change for every $1 change in the underlying asset’s price. When end users sell put options, market makers buy them, assuming a negative delta stance, thus prompting them to acquire the underlying asset to hedge (which has a positive delta). Conversely, when end users buy put options, dealers sell them, taking on a positive delta. Consequently, they need to sell the underlying asset (which has a negative delta) to hedge. In sharp and volatile market declines, options sellers may opt to cover their positions by purchasing options, thereby diminishing stability as counterparties hedge in line with the market movement.

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura.

Kris Sidial from The Ambrus Group emphasizes second-order effects are further amplified due to the large scale of options selling, adding concentration among market makers as another risk to watch. Scott Rubner, a tactical specialist at Goldman Sachs Group, concurs current market problems, and the unwind of stretched positioning may lead to a weak February.

Categories
Commentary

Turning Nickels Into Dollars: A Winning Strategy For Market Crashes

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Risk appetite in the last months was fueled by the emergence of a “goldilocks disinflation thesis,” describes Marko Kolanovic of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This thesis envisions a no-recession scenario where central banks cut rates early, especially in the lead-up to elections.

The market is banking on such anticipatory movement by the Federal Reserve, pricing five rate cuts and the target interest rate moving from 525-550 to 400-425 basis points by year-end. With the backdrop of easing liquidity conditions through 2025 and continuing economic growth, equity investors are positioning for a broader rally. This has led to churn and a loss of momentum.

Graphic: Retrieved from Carson Investment Research via Ryan Detrick.

Though historical trends encourage optimism, Kolanovic is concerned markets are overlooking geopolitical events, such as the Houthi shipping attacksexercises near the Suwałki Gap, and Russia’s testing of electronic warfare. Despite these potential disruptors, atypically low volatility skew and implied correlation indicate a lack of market responsiveness and positioning for less movement.

Recall skew reflects a scenario where increased market volatility disproportionately impacts farther away strike options due to losses from more frequent delta rebalancing in a moving market, leading option sellers to assign higher implied volatility to those strikes to compensate for increased risk. The relationship between index volatility and its components involves both individual volatilities and correlation, with implied correlation as a valuable indicator for pricing dynamics between index options and their components and trading volatility dispersion.

Appearing on The Market Huddle, Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan emphasized the impact of more structured product issuance and investor volatility selling on index levels, describing how it pins the index and lowers correlation. When a dealer, bank, or market maker on the other side owns options, they need to buy the market when it goes down and sell when it goes up, keeping the index tight and realized volatility low. Much less of this, or even the opposite, is happening in single stocks, so they aren’t experiencing the same level of suppression.

Graphic: Retrieved from The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial. Higher short Vega exposure, growing derivative income fund and equity short vol hedge fund AUM, a larger auto-callable market, and record-high dispersion trading flow suppress index vol, posing significant risks.

“As dealers buy and sell index exposure, market makers will attempt to keep the index level and the underlying basket in line via arbitrage constraints,” Newfound Research well explained in their Liquidity Cascades paper. “If dealer hedging has suppressed index-level volatility, but underlying components are still exhibiting idiosyncratic volatility, then the only reconciliation is a decline in correlation.”

SpotGamma’s Brent Kochuba weighs in, noting low correlation typically aligns with interim stock market highs, presenting a potential cause for caution. Examining data since January 2018, Kochuba points out that the SPX’s average close-to-close change is 88 basis points, with the open-to-close average at 70 basis points. This analysis suggests the current SPX implied volatility (IV) is relatively low. While low IV levels can persist, the concern arises as current readings hint at overbought conditions.

“These low IVs can last for some time, but the general point here is that current readings are starting to suggest overbought conditions as index vols are priced for risk-less perfection, and single stock vols expand due to upside call chasing.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Short-dated S&P 500 implied volatility is compressed. Updated Sunday, January 28, 2024.

Nomura Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott explains selling volatility, which continues to attract money as it’s been profitable, is a stabilizing trade in most cases. Kris Sidial, Co-Chief Investment Officer at The Ambrus Group, warns it may end spectacularly in his most recent appearances. The situation in China is a cautionary example, where stock volatility triggered a destructive selling cycle as market participants grappled with structured product risk management.

Graphic: Retrieved from Reuters.

Accordingly, for those who perceive a meaningful chance of movement, there is value in owning options, Goldman Sachs Group says, noting they expect more movement than is priced.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group via VolSignals.

Karsan, drawing parallels to the unwind of short volatility and dispersion trade from February to March of 2020, says the still-crowded trade can be compared to two sumo wrestlers or colossal plates on the Earth’s core exerting immense pressure against each other. While the trade may appear balanced and continue far longer, the accumulated pressures pose significant risks.

Graphic: Retrieved from JPMorgan Chase & Co via @jaredhstocks.

Major crashes happen when entities must trade volatility and options. Often, the trigger is the inability to cover the margin and meet regulatory requirements, causing a cascading effect.

Karsan, drawing on 25 years of experience, notes a precursor to a crash is a weakening supply of margin puts, particularly the highly convex and far out-of-the-money ones. These options play a significant role during stressful market periods, acting as indicators and drivers of impending crashes. The focus is on their convexity rather than whether they will be in the money, as the margin requirements become a determining factor in their impact on market dynamics. History shows a minor catalyst can lead to a dramatic unwind, turning one week to expiry $0.05 to $0.15 S&P 500 put options into $10.00 overnight.

“Prior to the XIV crash day, … going into the close the last hour, we saw nickel, ten, and five-cent options trade up to about $0.50 and $0.70. They really started to pop in the last hour. And then, the next day, we opened up and they were worth $10.00. You don’t see them go from a nickel to $0.50 very often. If you do, don’t sell them. Buy them, which is the next trade.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Setting aside the pessimistic narrative, the current scenario favors continued ownership of risk assets. Cautious optimism surrounds this week’s Quarterly Refunding Announcement (QRA), “depending on how much bill issuance is scaled back and on the absolute funding needs,” CrossBorder Capital explained, coupled with Fed-speak and anticipation of cutting interest rates on falling inflation later this year. Still, according to Unlimited Funds ‘ Bob Elliott, predicting outcomes following this week’s releases lacks an advantage; instead, in this environment of churn, momentum loss, and indicators like low correlation and volatility, last week’s trades for managing potential downside stick out, particularly vis-à-vis volatility skew.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Updated Sunday, January 28, 2024.
Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For April 4, 2023

LOAD LEVELS ON TRADINGVIEW BY CLICKING HERE.

Administrative Bulletin

Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest, a soon-to-launch research, consulting, trading, and asset management solutions provider. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for daily updates on the critical contexts that could lend to future market movement.

JPMorgan Chase & Co’s (NYSE: JPM) Marko Kolanovic believes the equities rally will falter, with headwinds from bank turbulence, an oil shock, and slowing growth poised to send stocks back toward their 2022 lows over the coming months. Kolanovic says this is “the calm before the storm,” adding that the equity rally is masking weaknesses from recent bank collapses and a decline in corporate profits and growth.

Read: Black Knight Mortgage Monitor Report.

As a validation, we can look to ISM’s inventories exceeding that of new orders, and a dip in cost-push prices, Bloomberg’s John Authers explains. The overall ISM measure is recessionary; the upcoming earnings season may be unforgiving, and companies with weaker EPS are likely to be penalized more due to the prospects of a recession.

Graphic: Retrieved from Sergei Perfiliev. “Based on this relationship, today’s PMI reading of 46.3 implies an earnings contraction of about 8% over the next 12 months or an SPX EPS of 204. Using the current forward PE ratio of 18.7, this leads to an index level of about 3,815. A ‘recessionary’ PE ratio of 15 will see the index at ~3,060, assuming earnings don’t fall further.”

Tech’s outperformance, driven partly by a supply of previously demanded downside put protection, has become even more magnified recently as traders ramped up bets that banking system stresses prompt the Federal Reserve to hit the brakes.

Read: SOFR Futures And Options 1st Edition

Graphic: Retrieved from @countdraghula. “We aren’t seeing the same thing for out-of-the-money calls on front-end futures. BUYING A CALL on front-end futures is taking a bet on Fed rates collapsing, especially if it is considerably out of the money, as below. Pricing for these is still sky high, despite some calm.”

Over the past weeks, we anticipated the markets trading “spiritedly for far longer,” quoting the likes of Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan, who said the signs of a combustible situation would emerge when options implied volatility is sticky in a market rally.

Typically, as the market trades higher, volatility levels for fixed-strike options should decrease. If broad implied volatility measures are bid and fixed-strike volatility increases, this may lead to a more combustible situation as options counterparties begin to thin out on volatility, resulting in less support.

We maintain that you can monetize the example call structures we provided and roll some profits into bear put spreads (i.e., buy put and sell another at a lower strike), though you may limit your expectations. Some think there is a greater likelihood of a “crash-less selloff, a grinding de-leveraging.”

Read: China’s Yuan Replaces Dollar As Most Traded Currency In Russia.

Disclaimer

Don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.

Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For February 16, 2023

Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read by thousands of subscribers. You, too, can join this community to learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets.

Graphic updated 6:15 AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /ES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /ES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. At the same time, the lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. The CBOE VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX) reflects the attractiveness of owning volatility. UMBS price via MNDClick here for the calendar.

Positioning

In the news is quite a bit of noise surrounding ultra-short-dated options with little time to expiry. To quote Nomura Holdings Inc’s (NYSE: NMR) Charlie McElligott, the trading of these options is adding noise; “US equities are such an untradable mess right now.” 

However, your letter writer, who mainly trades complex spreads on the cash-settled indexes, thinks there has never been a better time to trade. Ultra-short-dated options enable you to express your opinion in more efficient ways. Additionally, the trade of these options, in the aggregate, can influence market movements, and this is added opportunity if you understand it.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS) via Bloomberg.

Darrin Johnson, a volatility trader, recently discussed sharp ways to use these options.

Heading into some big events this week, John noted S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX) implied volatility (IVOL) was trading at ~25% on a five-day straddle. Traders could buy this structure while, in the interim, selling other structures like it “against CPI, Retail Sales, and PPI” where IVOL was higher. This would enable you to lower the cost of having positive exposure to movement or positive gamma via the five-day straddle, though this is operating on the premise “that Friday’s volatility will hold mostly steady, while the other 3 deflate.”

Moreover, the ultra-short-dated options are palatable if we will, and other traders, potentially much bigger in size, are observant of this too. The growing interest in these products (e.g., in the second half of last year, ultra-short-dated options made up more than 40% of the S&P 500’s trading volume) is growing in impact on underlying products like the SPX.

In fact, JPMorgan Chase & Co’s (NYSE: JPM) Peng Cheng found these options have an impact that “can vary from a drag of as much as 0.6% to a boost of up to 1.1%.” 

To explain, though as of late options counterparties may be playing a smaller role as “customers have taken equal and opposite sides” of positions, per SqueezeMetrics, we can naively look at there being a pool of liquidity to absorb the demand for these ultra-short-dated options which are very sensitive to time, price, and volatility. These increased sensitivities are hedged in a way that impacts this available pool of liquidity. If the trade or impact is large enough, it is transmitted onto underlying market prices. 

For instance, consider so-called meme mania and stocks like GameStop Corporation (NYSE: GME) that rocketed as traders’ interest in short-dated options demands rose. To hedge increased demand in call options, for instance, counterparties must buy the underlying stock. This demand boosts the stock.

Likewise, if traders’ consensus is that markets won’t move much until some large macroeconomic events, then their bets against market movement (i.e., sell ultra-short-dated options) will result in counterparties having more exposure to bets on market movement (i.e., positive gamma) which they will hedge in a way that reduces market movement (i.e., buy weakness or sell strength in the underlying stock). So, if traders bet against the movement, resulting in more counterparty positive gamma, then market movement is reduced due to the reaction to this positioning.

On the other hand, if traders’ consensus is that markets may move a lot, particularly to the downside, their bets on market movement (e.g., buy ultra-short-dated put) will result in counterparties having more exposure to bets against market movement (i.e., negative gamma). This demand for protection will bid options prices, particularly at the front-end of the IVOL term structure as counterparties price this demand in, and the counterparty will sell underlying to hedge. If fears are assuaged and traders no longer demand these bets on market movements, the counterparty can unwind their hedge which, in the put buying example provided, may provide a market boost, such as that which we saw immediately following the release of consumer price updates (CPI) this week; to quote Bloomberg, “[w]hen the worst didn’t happen, these hedges were unwound, helping propel a recovery in futures. It’s partly why the Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, dropped 7% in a seemingly outsize reaction in a market when the S&P 500 ended the session basically flat.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Additionally, the re-hedging-inspired recovery was short-lived as well; the impact of ultra-short-dated options, as this letter has stated before, is short-dated. It, too, does much less to influence measures like the Cboe Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX), a floating measure of ~30 day-to-expiry SPX options trading at a fixed-strike IVOL, though it does have an impact. Thus, the dis-interest to hedge stocks traders do not own (or hedge further stocks that may be hedged) out in time, does less to boost the VIX.

Anyways, in January, your letter writer interviewed The Ambrus Group’s co-CIO Kris Sidial about major risks to markets in 2023, as well as reasons why volatility could outperform in 2023 and beyond. Some of the information in that Benzinga interview made it into this newsletter in the days following its release. 

Basically, the SPX and VIX complexes are growing and, on the other side, are a small concentrated group of market makers taking on far more exposure to risk. 

Graphic: Retrieved from Ambrus’ publicly available research.

During moments of stress, as we’ve seen in the past with GME for example, options counterparties may be unable to keep up with the demands of investors, so you get a reflexive dynamic that helps push the stock higher. “That same dynamic can happen on the way down”; counterparties will mark up options prices during intense selling. As the options prices rise, options deltas (i.e., their exposure to direction) rise and this prompts so-called bearish vanna counterparty hedging flows in the underlying.

“Imagine a scenario where [some disaster happens] and everybody starts buying 0 DTE puts. That’s going to reflexively drive the S&P lower,” Sidial said. “Take, for example, the JPMorgan collar position that clearly has an effect on the market, and people are starting to understand that effect. That’s just one fund. Imagine the whole derivative ecosystem” leaning one way.

Graphic: Retrieved from Ambrus’ publicly available research.

Well, that’s what JPM’s Marko Kolanovic just said is a major risk and could exacerbate market volatility. “While history doesn’t repeat, it often rhymes,” he explained, noting that the trade of ultra-short-dated options portends a Volmageddon 2.0. If you recall, in 2018, Volmageddon 1.0 turned successful long-running short-volatility trades on their head when traders who were betting against big movements in the market saw their profits erode in days.

Further, to conclude this section since your letter writer is running short on time, as Sidial said, “if you’re trading volatility, let there be an underlying catalyst for doing so.” From a “risk-to-reward perspective, … it’s a better bet to be on the long volatility side,” given “that there are so many things that … keep popping up” from a macro perspective. Check out our letters from the past weeks where we talked about protecting profits (e.g., sell call vertical to finance and buy a put vertical with a lot of time to expiry).

For Ambrus’ publicly available research, click here. Also, follow Sidial on Twitter, here. Consider reading your letter writer’s past two conversations with Sidial, as well. Here is an article on 2021 and the meme stock debacle. Here is another article talking more about Ambrus’ processes.

Technical

As of 6:15 AM ET, Thursday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET), in the S&P 500, is likely to open in the lower part of a balanced overnight inventory, inside of the prior day’s range, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.

The S&P 500 pivot for today is $4,153.25. 

Key levels to the upside include $4,168.75, $4,189.00, and $4,206.25.

Key levels to the downside include $4,136.25, $4,122.75, and $4,104.25.

Disclaimer: Click here to load the updated key levels via the web-based TradingView platform. New links are produced daily. Quoted levels likely hold barring an exogenous development.

Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.

Definitions

Volume Areas: Markets will build on areas of high-volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for a period of time, this will be identified by a low-volume area (LVNodes). The LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test.

If participants auction and find acceptance in an area of a prior LVNode, then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to the nearest HVNodes for more favorable entry or exit.

POCs: Areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.


About

The author, Renato Leonard Capelj, works in finance and journalism.

Capelj spends the bulk of his time at Physik Invest, an entity through which he invests and publishes free daily analyses to thousands of subscribers. The analyses offer him and his subscribers a way to stay on the right side of the market. Separately, Capelj is an options analyst at SpotGamma and an accredited journalist.

Capelj’s past works include conversations with investor Kevin O’Leary, ARK Invest’s Catherine Wood, FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, Lithuania’s Minister of Economy and Innovation Aušrinė Armonaitė, former Cisco chairman and CEO John Chambers, and persons at the Clinton Global Initiative.

Connect

Direct queries to renato@physikinvest.com or find Physik Invest on TwitterLinkedInFacebook, and Instagram.

Calendar

You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.

Disclaimer

Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes.

Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For November 28, 2022

Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read by over 1,200 people. To join this community and learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets, subscribe below.

Graphic updated 6:50 AM ET. Sentiment Risk-Off if expected /ES open is below the prior day’s range. /ES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Levels may have changed since initially quoted; click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. At the same time, the lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. VIX reflects a current reading of the CBOE Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX) from 0-100.

Administrative

Hope you had a great holiday with your closest!

Fundamental

Minutes from a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting dropped last week.

As strategist Rishi Mishra summarized well, “the focus shift[ed] to the terminal rate from the pace of tightening; although the terminal rate would be higher than previously expected, the pace at which we get there will be slower because they want to take lags into account.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Rishi Mishra.

At its core, the economy has not slowed as much as the Fed was expecting, said Ellen Meade, a former Fed Board economist; “[t]hey can’t stop the rate increases until they see some measured evidence that the economy is slowing.”

So, with inflation “still at its highest since the 1980s,” according to Fabian Wintersberger, all the while financial conditions have loosened on easing inflation pressures, markets have yet to face their “most significant problems, [and] … keeping interest rates around 5% will not be a Fed pivot” (which is likely to happen near the middle of 2023, per the consensus analysis).

In short, the Fed must further raise rates and unwind liquidity injections.

To bring the “balance sheet back to [2020 levels], [the Fed] needs to reduce it by 41%.” The balance sheet has only been reduced by 1.5%. Should liquidity keep shrinking, that pulls investors out of risk.

Graphic: Via Physik Invest. Data compiled by @jkonopas623. Fed Balance Sheet data, here. Treasury General Account Data, here. Reverse Repo data, here. NL = BS – TGA – RRP.

Positioning

From a volatility perspective, it’s not a terrible time to hedge

An example demonstrates the point, well. As lightly discussed in last week’s letters, in mid-June, a trading partner and I noticed a change in tone in the non-linearity of volatility and skew with respect to linear changes in the price of the market or S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX).

The cost of certain spread structures (e.g., long/short one option near- or at-the-money and short/long two or more further out-of-the-money options) changed by hundreds of percent for only a few basis points of change in the underlying’s price.

Here’s more detail:

The market rose (boosted by a “vol crunch” and “systemic exposure reallocation,” per Nomura Holdings Inc’s [NYSE: NMR] Charlie McElligott) and, though top-line measures of IVOL have declined (e.g., INDEX: VIX), volatility skew is performing well.

Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView. Top, S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX). Middle Nations SkewDex (INDEX: SDEX). Bottom Cboe Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX). According to one paper from Nations Indexes, “SkewDex tells market participants how expensive out-of-the-money options are in relation to at-the-money options and thus, how risk-averse investors are.”

As Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan once explained, this suggests “a potentially critical change in dealer positioning [and] the distribution of underlying outcomes”.

IVOL is at a lower bound and the bullish impacts yielded by its compressing have, largely, played out.

There is more to be gained by movement higher in IVOL. By owning protection, particularly that which is farther from current prices, you are positioned to monetize on non-linear repricings of volatility (as we saw earlier this year and may still see).

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura Holdings Inc (NYSE: NMR).

Technical

As of 6:45 AM ET, Monday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET), in the S&P 500, is likely to open in the lower part of a negatively skewed overnight inventory, outside of prior-range and -value, suggesting a potential for immediate directional opportunity.

Our S&P 500 pivot for today is $4,000.25. 

Key levels to the upside include $4,024.00, $4,051.00, and $4,069.25. 

Key levels to the downside include $3,985.00, $3,965.25, and $3,923.00.

Click here to load today’s key levels into the web-based TradingView platform. All levels are derived using the 65-minute timeframe. New links are produced, daily.

Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.

Definitions

Overnight Rally Highs (Lows): Typically, there is a low historical probability associated with overnight rally-highs (lows) ending the upside (downside) discovery process.

Volume Areas: A structurally sound market will build on areas of high volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for long periods of time, it will lack sound structure, identified as low volume areas (LVNodes). LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test. 

If participants were to auction and find acceptance into areas of prior low volume (LVNodes), then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to HVNodes for favorable entry or exit.

POCs: POCs are valuable as they denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.

MCPOCs: POCs are valuable as they denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent over numerous day sessions. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.

About

After years of self-education, strategy development, mentorship, and trial-and-error, Renato Leonard Capelj began trading full-time and founded Physik Invest to detail his methods, research, and performance in the markets. 

Capelj also writes options market analyses at SpotGamma and is a Benzinga journalist. 

His past works include private discussions with ARK Invest’s Catherine Wood, investors Kevin O’Leary and John Chambers, the infamous Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, former Bridgewater Associate Andy Constan, Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan, The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial, the Lithuanian Delegation’s Aušrinė Armonaitė, among many others.

Contact

Direct queries to renato@physikinvest.com or Renato Capelj#8625 on Discord.

Disclaimer

Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes.

Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For November 16, 2022

Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read by over 1,200 people. To join this community and learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets, subscribe below.

Graphic updated 7:15 AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /ES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /ES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Levels may have changed since initially quoted; click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. At the same time, the lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. VIX reflects a current reading of the CBOE Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX) from 0-100.

Administrative

There will be no Daily Brief published on Thursday, November 17, 2022.

Positioning

Given where realized (RVOL) and implied (IVOL) volatility measures are, as well as skew, it is beneficial to enter into such trades including protective collars (i.e., sell call, buy put), as stated in yesterday’s letter and explicitly discussed by the likes of Nomura Holdings Inc’s (NYSE: NMR) Charlie McElligott. 

To quote McElligott: The “legacy ‘short skew’ trade that’s been the key US equities vol theme of 2022 is now at risk of its own ‘regime change’ reversal, too. This is, then, especially interesting when considering that ongoing VIX call [or] call spread buying … generally some pretty ‘tail-y’ stuff that is beginning to get loaded into.”

Graphic: Retrieved from The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial. This is “gutter low vol.”

Entering trades that change non-linearly with respect to changes in implied volatility (IVOL) and direction (Delta) exposes participants to convexity (Gamma).

A simple way to think about this is if the market was to shock lower by one, all else equal, the derivative’s value would change in excess of that. On the other hand, if one was short static (not dynamic) Delta, meaning they profit from that movement lower, profits realized would be one for one with the change in the underlying.

Graphic: Retrieved from Banco Santander SA (NYSE: SAN).

So, given the flat skew we mentioned earlier, it is attractive in price to hedge against the downside. Whether that downside materializes, is another story.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS). Equity skew is so depressed in the US that one could buy a multiple of the calls they sold in the S&P 500, elsewhere.

Food For Thought:

This is amidst the responsiveness near key technical areas provided in past letters. It suggests traders with short time horizons are very active and anchoring to key areas, such as $4,000.00 in the S&P 500. These same participants will often lack the wherewithal to defend retests, and big participants (some of whom move by committee) seldom respond to those technical inflections. 

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

According to SpotGamma, a provider of data and written analyses on the options market, data shows the “$4,000.00 strike continu[ing] to dominate both in terms of position sizing” with calls, at that level most likely “being sold, which has helped maintain $4,000.00 resistance.”

The sale of IVOL leaves counterparties with long (+Delta) exposure to be hedged through sales (-Delta) of the underlying. As the market trades higher, these options, which are very close to current market prices, have a lot of Gamma, meaning they are very sensitive to changes in the price of the underlying (or convex and non-linear to direction). That means these options can go from having little value to a lot of value, quickly.

Graphic: Taken from Exotic Options and Hybrids: A Guide to Structuring, Pricing and Trading. 

If the market is below $4,000.00 and trading higher, while at $4,000.00 there is a lot of this trade going on, then the counterparty will sell the underlying to offset gains in their options while the reverse happens if the market is trading down, as SpotGamma data showed, yesterday. When the market traded lower, positive Delta was firing off, which is supportive, hence the mean-reversion back to $4,000.00 into the close.

Graphic: SPY HIRO. Retrieved from SpotGamma’s Twitter. Posted 11/15/2022 at 1:42 PM ET.

A quick check of how sticky these areas may be, look at the level of positive Gamma.

As traders bet against the market movement, counterparties take on more exposure to positive Gamma. In hedging this positive Gamma, the counterparty does more to reduce market movement.

Couple this mean-reversion-type activity with the structural Delta buyback linked to the passage of time (Charm) and compression of volatility (Vanna), these conditions do more to bolster continued relief, as put forth by Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Another consequence, as picked up by individuals online including Darrin John, the S&P 500’s realized volatility (RVOL) “is so high” with “a basket of 500 of the ‘best’ stocks in the US [wildly] swing[ing] +5% in a single day,” while the S&P 500 is relatively mute, as your letter writer sees it.

In general, something has to give. If there are forces that are pinning the S&P 500, all the while there are arbitrage constraints connecting the components and all, then correlation must break and dispersion must increase. In short, this is a trader’s market; data shows managers tend to “outperform the worst by more during periods of lower correlation,” as does “higher dispersion.”

Should traders continue to hone in on key areas, and add to the interest and volume near those areas, then the market is likely prone to more of the same. Expect pinning and sideways to up. If there were to be a decrease in positive Gamma exposures, that likely opens the door to more movement. Likewise, if traders’ bets are concentrated elsewhere (higher or lower), that can open the door to relief. A catalyst for that may be something fundamental.

The Key Takeaway:

Recent happenings mimic that of the Global Financial Crisis when, according to The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial, “vol slowly [ground] until the eventual October 2008 move (i.e., Lehman).” 

“The markets were understanding that there was a change going on, especially in credit. But that risk was discounted until it was forced into realization.”

Simple trades to protect (or capitalize on this) include collars, as stated earlier, as well as calendars. If you expect RVOL on the index level, at least, to be mute, then sell short-dated exposure and use those proceeds to purchase farther-dated exposure (e.g., sell weekly put to buy monthly put).

Why? 

When you think there is to be an outsized move in the underlying, relative to what is priced, you buy options (+Gamma). When you think there is to be an outsized move in the implied volatility, relative to what is priced, you buy options (+Volga). If there’s a large change in direction (RVOL) or IVOL repricing, you may make money. 

Ultimately, “liquidity providers’ response to demand for protection (en masse) would, then, likely exacerbate the move and aid in the repricing of IVOL to levels where there would be more stored energy to catalyze a rally,” as we saw after elections and CPI … 

Graphic: Commentary published by Kai Volatility.

… alongside the Dollar’s (INDEX: DXY) weakness which is easing the burden on margins and global funding.

Per Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), “simple math on S&P 500 earnings from currency is that for every percentage point increase on a YoY basis, it’s [] a 0.5 hit to EPS growth.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Technical

As of 7:15 AM ET, Wednesday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET), in the S&P 500, is likely to open in the middle part of a balanced overnight inventory, inside of prior-range and -value, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.

Our S&P 500 pivot for today is $4,000.25. 

Key levels to the upside include $4,027.00, $4,069.25, and $4,136.75. 

Key levels to the downside include $3,965.25, $3,913.00, and $3,871.25.

Click here to load today’s key levels into the web-based TradingView platform. All levels are derived using the 65-minute timeframe. New links are produced, daily.

Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.

Definitions

Volume Areas: A structurally sound market will build on areas of high volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for long periods of time, it will lack sound structure, identified as low volume areas (LVNodes). LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test. 

If participants were to auction and find acceptance into areas of prior low volume (LVNodes), then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to HVNodes for favorable entry or exit.

POCs: POCs are valuable as they denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.

MCPOCs: POCs are valuable as they denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent over numerous day sessions. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.

About

After years of self-education, strategy development, mentorship, and trial-and-error, Renato Leonard Capelj began trading full-time and founded Physik Invest to detail his methods, research, and performance in the markets. 

Capelj also writes options market analyses at SpotGamma and is a Benzinga journalist. 

His past works include private discussions with ARK Invest’s Catherine Wood, investors Kevin O’Leary and John Chambers, the infamous Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, former Bridgewater Associate Andy Constan, Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan, The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial, the Lithuanian Delegation’s Aušrinė Armonaitė, among many others.

Contact

Direct queries to renato@physikinvest.com or Renato Capelj#8625 on Discord.

Disclaimer

Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes.

Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For September 22, 2022

The daily brief is a free glimpse into the prevailing fundamental and technical drivers of U.S. equity market products. Join the 950+ that read this report daily, below!

Graphic updated 8:00 AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /ES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /ES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of the following section. Levels may have changed since initially quoted; click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) calculations are based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. At the same time, the lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. VIX reflects a current reading of the CBOE Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX) from 0-100.

Administrative

An easy read, today. For more complex, see the September 20 and 19 letters. Also, there will not be a letter published for Friday, September 23, 2022. See you next week, team!

Fundamental

Equity markets traded down, yesterday, on the heels of the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) decision to raise interest rates by 0.75% and “keep at it” for longer, eyeing a 1.25% jump, in sum, by 2023.

This puts the current target rate at 3.00-3.25%.

Separately, if the “keep at it” quote sounds familiar, that’s because it is. The Fed Paul Volcker’s memoir is titled “Keeping at It.”

Graphic: CME Group Inc’s (NASDAQ: CME) FedWatch Tool shows higher odds of a 75 to 100 basis point rate hike in November, along the lines of what the futures market was pricing heading into the event.

The Fed Chair Jerome Powell admitted there may be below-trend growth and the potential for unemployment to reach 4.4% next year, up from the current rate of 3.7%. Projected increases, as of yesterday, show interest rates at 4.4% by 2023, and 4.6% in 2023, before moderation in 2024 to 3.9%, as well summarized by Bloomberg.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Moreover, economists suggest that raising rates to 4.5% would cost the economy nearly 1.7 million jobs while rates at 5% would bring that number to 2 million. A higher savings rate and increased funds at the state level would likely cushion the blow, however.

In response, the likes of Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood, who we quoted recently regarding her thoughts on why the Fed needs to lower the pace of tightening and/or cut, said:

“Most disappointing about the Fed’s decision today was its unanimity. None of those voting on the Federal Reserve is focused on the significant price deflation in the pipeline. The Fed seems to be making decisions based on lagging indicators and analogies.”

She adds that the Fed is setting the stage for deflation:

“The Fed is solving supply chain issues by crushing demand and, in my view, unleashing deflation, setting it up for a major pivot.”

Graphic: Initially retrieved from Bloomberg. Taken from Ophir Gottlieb who concludes costs are dropping, as observed via shipping, gasoline, manufacturing, cars, and rent measures.

Moreover, it’s the case that “[a]s rates rise and debt servicing costs increase, ‘many zombie institutions, zombie households, corporates, banks, shadow banks, and zombie countries are going to die,’” said economist Nouriel Roubini, who predicted the 2008 financial crisis. 

Prior to the Fed event, Roubini forecasted a 75 basis point hike in September, followed by a 50 basis point hike in November. The market is pricing more than what Roubini thought the Fed would probably do after Wednesday’s Fed meeting.

In his opinion, stay “light on equities and have more cash, … [as] equities and other assets can fall by 10%, 20%, 30%.”

Positioning

In short, unexpected was the post-event response. In recent times, post-Fed moves have been positive, driven by the “rebalancing of dealer inventory,” per Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan.

That didn’t happen and let’s unpack why.

Basically, into the event, traders demanded protection and bid implied volatility (IVOL). The assumption is that counterparties, who are likely on the other end, have exposure to positive Delta and negative Gamma, which they hedge through negative Delta trades in the underlying.

Should fears have been assuaged, the supply of that protection once demanded, would have decreased IVOL (and options Delta), providing the markets a boost.

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics.

That didn’t happen. Instead, traders added protection, as shown by this SpotGamma graphic tracking changes in put open interest on the S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX).

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Updated September 22, 2022.

This bid some basic measures of IVOL into the close.

Graphic: Retrieved from VIX Central. Updated September 21, 2022.

That’s as these particular options, which were added at much lower prices, as I explained in a SpotGamma note, recently, “are far more sensitive to changes in direction and IVOL.”

These options can go “from having very little Delta (exposure to direction) to a lot more Delta on the move lower,” quickly. “If we maintain that liquidity providers are short those puts, a positive Delta trade, then those liquidity providers [will sell] futures and stock, a negative Delta trade to stay hedged.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics.

Notwithstanding, it’s still the case that a “reload on fresh short-dated downside” flows heighten the risk of a “negative Delta squeeze … into month end,” said Nomura Holdings Inc’s (NYSE: NMR) Charlie McElligott. 

Therefore, “you have to consider a move up [to] $4,000.00 as part of your distribution of outcomes to the upside,” as that is near where “market makers are ‘long,’” as part of an impactful collar trade many are aware sits.

As an aside, some online conversation was sparked around placing cash into riskless trades for some small, but guaranteed, rates of return. In that conversation, Box Spreads were put forth as a solution to lend cash and earn a competitive interest rate.

For context, “Boxes allow market participants to create a loan structure similar to a Treasury bill. T-bills are ‘discount’ instruments that are purchased at a value less than the stated face value. Upon maturity, bills call for the return of the stated face value.”

“For example, one might buy a $1 million 90-day T-bill for $998,000. Ninety days later, the $1 million face or principal value is returned and the $2,000 discount is earned as interest. One may represent the rate on this transaction as a 0.80% or 80 basis point discount yield [= (360/90) x ($2,000/$1,000,000)]. The effective rate on a box represents a ‘discount yield’ similar to a quoted T-bill rate.”

Graphic: Retrieved from boxtrades.com.

IPS Strategic Capital’s Pat Hennessy explains that SPX boxes “typically yield[] 20-40 bps above [the] corresponding maturity risk-free rate.” Additionally, there are tax advantages to using the S&P 500’s 1256 contracts. 

For easier fills, use the “3K/4K line in an AM settled expiry,” Hennessy noted. “Helps if you know where the broker market is.”

Technical

As of 8:00 AM ET, Thursday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET), in the S&P 500, is likely to open in the upper part of a balanced overnight inventory, inside of prior-range and -value, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.

In the best case, the S&P 500 trades higher.

Any activity above the $3,826.25 HVNode puts into play the $3,857.25 HVNode. Initiative trade beyond the latter could reach as high as the $3,893.00 VPOC and $3,936.25 ONH, or higher.

In the worst case, the S&P 500 trades lower.

Any activity below the $3,826.25 HVNode puts into play the $3,770.75 HVNode. Initiative trade beyond the HVNode could reach as low as the $3,722.50 LVNode and $3,688.75 HVNode, or lower.

Click here to load today’s key levels into the web-based TradingView charting platform. Note that all levels are derived using the 65-minute timeframe. New links are produced, daily.
Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.

Definitions

Volume Areas: A structurally sound market will build on areas of high volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for long periods of time, it will lack sound structure, identified as low volume areas (LVNodes). LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test. 

If participants were to auction and find acceptance into areas of prior low volume (LVNodes), then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to HVNodes for favorable entry or exit.

POCs: POCs are valuable as they denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.

MCPOCs: POCs are valuable as they denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent over numerous day sessions. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.

About

After years of self-education, strategy development, mentorship, and trial-and-error, Renato Leonard Capelj began trading full-time and founded Physik Invest to detail his methods, research, and performance in the markets.

Capelj also develops insights around impactful options market dynamics at SpotGamma and is a Benzinga reporter.

Some of his works include conversations with ARK Invest’s Catherine Wood, investors Kevin O’Leary and John Chambers, FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, ex-Bridgewater Associate Andy Constan, Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan, The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial, among many others.

Disclaimer

In no way should the materials herein be construed as advice. Derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. All content is for informational purposes only.