Categories
Commentary

The End Game

Good Morning! I hope you have a great start to the week. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Bursts of volatility punctuate calm and resilience, resulting in demand for safety and protection in everything from stocks and commodities to bonds and currencies. The general agreement is that macroeconomic policy and geopolitics are to blame, and investors are repositioning to stem risk and potential bleeding in their portfolios. This sometimes disturbs historical trends and relationships. 

Thank you for tuning in. We will unpack much of it herein. Let’s get into it.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Hedging Against Monetary Inflation, Weaponized Dollars, And Debt Monetization

Gold serves as a prime example. Instead of being guided by conventional catalysts, including real interest rates (i.e., nominal interest rate minus inflation), growth prospects, and currencies like the dollar, recent movements are more likely driven by factors like central bank accumulation on macroeconomic and geopolitical shifts.

For instance, China may increase its gold reserves to hedge potential disruptions and sanctions, as Russia saw after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022, or establish a collateral reserve for an autonomous financial system. Likewise, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Singapore have also increased their gold reserves.

As liquidity in the gold market is thinner, this buying activity amplifies volatility and disrupts established trends. Therefore, fast moves up!

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via SuperMacro.

Why could gold continue this upward trajectory?

The typical trajectory is guided by monetary inflation, characterized by increasing liquidity within the financial system. According to CrossBorder Capital, gold moves 1.5 times the liquidity growth, a solid sensitivity to so-called monetary expansion. Bitcoin, often considered a digital gold, moves sooner and exhibits higher sensitivity.

Recent expressions of interest in Treasury securities by central banking authorities, such as Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller, further fuel ascents. New demand would lead to higher bond prices and lower yields.

Therefore, gold continues surging due to geopolitical shifts, liquidity in the financial system, and the potential for debt monetization. The latter occurs when excessive debts prompt central bank authorities to intervene, using printed money to purchase bonds to manage interest rate levels more effectively.

“Investors are looking beyond the ‘here and now,’ realizing that there is no way markets or the economy can sustain 5% nominal and 2% real rates,” Bank of America elaborates. Investors are “hedging two things: i) the risk that the Fed cuts as CPI accelerates, and ii) and more ominously, the ‘endgame of Fed Interest Cost Control (‘ICC’), Yield Curve Control (YCC) and QE to backstop US government spending.’”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America.

There is bi-modality. Typically, high rates are bad for gold. But, with debts and rates as they are, the probability of debt monetization increases. For now, we have a cycle wherein stocks and commodities may rise with a firming economy, and bonds may offer limited salvation, nodding to higher-for-longer rates.

Hedging Loss Of Momentum And Left Tails Following Big Move-Up And De-levering

Interest rate increases are likely only on the horizon if something unexpected occurs. Given that stocks are priced well, the question arises: how can we protect ourselves while many anticipate, based on market pricing, either minimal changes to the status quo or a substantial event triggering a broad downturn?

For one, commodities don’t do much good in a broad downturn.

Consider the years 2001 (during the tech bubble), 2008 (amidst the global financial crisis), 2015 (the flash crash), 2018 (during Volmageddon), and 2020 (amidst the pandemic). According to Kris Sidial of The Ambrus Group, gold was an ineffective hedge against equities during these periods.

So, how do we hedge the middle reality between “minimal” and “substantial.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

While direct bets on equity volatility bursts have been prominent, digestion trades may be a better alternative. Let’s unpack why.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

The first idea involves hedging downside thrusts in equities via call options in the Cboe Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX), Goldman Sachs, and UBS note. This isn’t necessarily optimal. Volatility is high over the short term and may revert quickly, indirectly boosting stocks. The alternative strategy entails selling options and utilizing the funds to purchase similar options with later expiration dates. Such digestion trades enable traders to capitalize on increases in volatility in the near term, reducing their costs on longer-term trades.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma’s April 15, 2024 Founder Note.

To explain, in a recent letter to subscribers, SpotGamma shared that numerous expiring VIX call options were in the money. In other words, this exposure, which makes money if the VIX and S&P 500 implied volatility (or the options market’s anticipation of future movement in the underlying), was soon to disappear. Accordingly, the hedges to this exposure would do the same, and the rebalancing after that would be enough to buoy markets.

We’ll try to break it down further in the simplest way possible. 

The S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX) and VIX are inversely correlated. When the S&P 500 falls, the VIX tends to rise. Naive of us to say, we know, but bear with us.

One can buy an SPX put or a VIX call to hedge a portfolio’s volatility. Let’s say one buys an SPX put, and the other side of this trade sells an SPX put. The other side may hedge this short put by selling stock and futures correlated to the S&P 500. Let us say the S&P 500 falls and volatility rises (pictured below). That counterparty may have to sell more stock and futures, pressuring markets. If this now valuable put expires, the counterparty will buy back the stock and futures it sold. This can support markets or do less to exacerbate movement and underlying volatility.

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics.

SpotGamma’s data suggests the markets are not facing an impending crash; instead, per their April 17, 2024 note, “if stocks rally and IV drops, it may add more stock for dealers to buy.” I plug SpotGamma because I worked there. Check them out! 😀

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

So, calendar and unbalanced butterfly or ratio spread trades (pictured naively below), a play on the recent richness (pictured much further above) of options, may help capture the low case of downside and stem potential portfolio volatility.

Graphic: Retrieved from Physik Invest.

Flipping these trades (i.e., using call options in the SPX instead of put options) allows one to play the market rising. For instance, let us say the upside of gold and silver will continue, but only after stopping and digesting recent movements. You can sell a call expiring soon and buy one later at the same strike price. Your loss is, technically, limited to the amount paid for the trade.

Graphic: Retrieved from Schwab’s thinkorswim platform.

In general, ratio spreads, and butterfly trades are designed to capitalize on movement toward specific price levels, while outright calls and puts are better suited for hedging sharp movements.

The former two strategies serve as practical tools for safeguarding the value of your positions during periods of heightened volatility. In such environments, the options you own are positioned closer to the market, usually retaining their value well, while the options you sell are priced higher than usual and located farther from the market, with more value to decay into expiry. 

Consequently, while the options you own tend to keep their value, the options you sell struggle to retain theirs. As a result, the spread can appreciate even without significant movement, particularly if implied volatility declines significantly at the furthest strikes. Earlier this year, such was true in Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) and Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA).

SMCI was trending up, and traders were feverishly betting/hedging this reality. In a 20-page case study we may release, we detail how Physik Invest navigated this environment successfully. In short, we bought options closer to where the market was trading and sold more of them in places where we thought the market wouldn’t end up going. With implied volatility jacked, for lack of better phrasing, it was often difficult for those far-away and short-dated options to keep their value. Hence, we managed to put trades on for low or no cost and flip them for significant credits!!!

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. SMCI volatility skew.

In any case, there’s been a weakening under the surface of the indexes (see below).

Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView via Physik Invest. Black = Breadth Measure.

Later, when breadth improves, we can use the portfolio volatility-reducing trades discussed to cut costs or buy more stocks, anticipating upside continuation. According to Carson Group’s Ryan Detrick, the S&P 500 experienced its first close below the 50-day moving average in 110 trading days, marking the longest streak since 2011. Following similar streaks, stocks were higher three months later, 88% of the time, and six months later, 81% of the time. “A warning? Maybe, but maybe not.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Ryan Detrick of Carson Group.

If you enjoyed this week’s letter, comment below and share. Thanks and take care!

Categories
Commentary

Yield Hunger Sparks Concerns Of A Volmageddon Redux

Good Morning! I hope you are having a good week. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

As we step into Spring, we’re riding the wave of one of the strongest stock market rallies in over fifty years. It’s been a period of smooth sailing, with record highs beckoning transition from concern over potential downturns to the fear of being left out of further gains.

The BIS has commented on some of these trading behaviors, which can drive upward momentum and foster a sense of calm or low volatility. They point to the increased use of yield-enhancing structured products as a critical reason for reducing volatility. These products have stolen the show, boosting investor returns by selling options or betting against market fluctuations. In calm markets, those on the opposite side of these bets hedge in a way that reduces volatility: they buy when underlying asset prices dip and sell when they rise. As the supply of options increases, the liquidity injected to hedge stifles movement, resulting in a stubbornly low Cboe Volatility Index or VIX.

The BIS example illustrates a product that sells call options against an index position to lower the cost basis by collecting premiums. The counterparty buys call options and hedges by selling the same index. If the call options lose value or the market declines, the counterparty buys back the index they sold initially. This strategy is constructive and potentially bullish, especially in a rising market, as one could infer counterparties may postpone rebalancing to optimize profits (i.e., swiftly cut losses and allow profits to accumulate).

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank for International Settlements.

However, these trading behaviors come with risks. 

While individual stocks may experience volatility, the indexes representing them move begrudgingly. Investors have concentrated on selling options or volatility (the all-encompassing term) on indexes to fund volatility in individual components, a strategy known as dispersion. Although typically stabilizing, experts caution that it can end dramatically. One can look at the destructive selling in China as a cautionary example.

Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan compares the trade to two sumo wrestlers or colossal plates on the Earth’s core exerting immense pressure against each other. While the trade may appear balanced and continue far longer, the accumulated pressures pose significant risks. Major crashes (up or down) happen when entities are compelled to trade volatility and options. Often, the trigger is the inability to cover the margin and meet regulatory requirements, causing a cascading effect (e.g., GameStop and 2020 crash).

The current scenario mirrors the conditions before Volmageddon, where short-volatility tactics failed. 

With implied correlations low, a market shock could see investors exiting their positions abruptly, amplifying volatility. Karsan notes a precursor to such a crash is a weakening supply of margin puts, particularly the highly convex and far out-of-the-money ones. These options play a significant role during stressful market periods, acting as indicators and drivers of impending crashes. The focus is on convexity (i.e., the rate of change of delta for changes in the underlying asset’s price or the nonlinear relationship between the option’s price and the underlying asset) rather than whether there are good odds the underlying asset will trade down to the options in question.

“Implied vol is about liquidity. It isn’t about fear or greed,” writes Capital Flows Research. “Implied vol is about liquidity on specific parts of the distribution of returns on an asset. Remember, even the outright price of an asset is pricing a distribution of outcomes, not a single destination. Options make this even more explicit by having various strikes and expirations with differing premiums and discounts.”

History shows a minor catalyst can lead to a dramatic unwind. Take what happened with S&P 500 options a day before XIV crash day.

“Going into the close the last hour, we saw nickel, ten, and five-cent options trade up to about $0.50 and $0.70,” Karsan elaborates. “They really started to pop in the last hour.”

“And then, the next day, we opened up and they were worth $10.00. You often don’t see them go from a nickel to $0.50. If you do, don’t sell them. Buy them, which is the next trade.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Similar to downward crashes, there are occasional but now more common upward crashes. 

Recent market movements, particularly the surge in stocks such as Nvidia, Super Micro Computer, and MicroStrategy, echo the frenzy seen with high-flying stocks like GameStop in 2021. This caused losses for some liquidity providers and funds that mistakenly equated the price or level of volatility with value, selling it at a discount to where it would eventually trade.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Simplify Asset Management’s Michael Green.

“I remember several traders I knew trying to short-vol on GME when it was at 300 because it was ‘cheap’ due to its level,” Capital Flows Research adds. “They were blown out of those positions.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Capital Flows Research.

So, we have played along, nodding to George Soros’s famous statement: “When I see a bubble forming, I rush in to buy, adding fuel to the fire. That is not irrational.”

To explain, we go deeper into something known as implied volatility skew.

Skew refers to the difference in implied volatility across different strike options on the same underlying asset. Typically, options with farther away strike prices (out-of-the-money puts) have higher implied volatility than options with higher strike prices (at-the-money calls).

Implied volatility skew, as shown below, is often nonsymmetrical due to higher demand for downside protection.

When volatility skews become steeper, the disparity in implied volatility between various strike prices widens. For instance, the implied volatility of out-of-the-money (OTM) puts, which offer protection against market downturns, rises compared to at-the-money (ATM) puts and upside protection (calls). This steepening volatility skew indicates heightened apprehension among investors regarding potentially large downward market movements. Similarly, when the implied volatility of upside protection (calls) surpasses that of downside protection (puts), it signals growing concern (i.e., FOMO) about potential upward market movements. A steepening call volatility skew results from distant call options pricing higher implied volatility than usual due to investor demand/fear.

Graphic: Retrieved from Exotic Options and Hybrids: A Guide to Structuring, Pricing and Trading.

As savvy traders, we can construct creative structures and sell options against the closer ones we own to lower our costs on bullish trades. We detailed such bullish trades in our last two commentaries titled “BOXXing For Beginners” and “Foreshocks.” The outcomes for one of Physik Invest’s accounts are detailed below.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

Regrettably, enthusiasm is waning. Using Nvidia as an illustration, the stock surged 2.6% on Friday but plummeted 8% on the same day. The call skew was elevated over the weekend before leveling off earlier this week, which poses difficulties for traders betting on further upward movement.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

We discussed how such a flattening could foreshadow waning risk appetite and potentially herald market softness. SpotGamma indicates that call skews are flattening across the board, as illustrated in the chart below.

The red bars on the left represent approximately 90th percentile skews during a significant stock rally. However, a week later, on the right side, the skew rankings decline. “This appears like the uniformly bullish action in top tech stocks is breaking apart,” SpotGamma explains. This “is a reduction in bullish exuberance.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

This activity will not likely disrupt the broader market; markets will stay intact as traders double down, selling shorter-dated volatility and buying farther-dated ones. We observe this using SpotGamma’s Fixed Strike Matrix below. In a simplistic sense, red indicates selling, while green suggests buying.

“By default, cells are color-coded red-to-green based on the Implied Volatility Z-Score,” SpotGamma explains. “If the cell is red, Implied Volatility is lower than the average implied volatility over the past two months. If the cell is green, Implied Volatility is higher than the implied volatility over the past two months.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma on Monday, March 11, 2024.

The recent compression in short-term volatility aids stabilization, leading to restrained ranges in the indexes relative to components. Among these components, which drove the S&P 500 upwards, some big ones face downward pressure, partly due to the expiration of previously demanded/bought call options. This expiration prompts those initially selling these (e.g., call) options to re-hedge by selling the corresponding stocks.

Graphic: Retrieved from Damped Spring Advisors.

As the indexes remain fixed, the only resolution is a decline in correlation. As larger stocks decline, smaller constituents rise, contributing to the strength observed in the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

Graphic: Retrieved from Macro Ops.

Breadth can be evaluated naively by comparing the S&P 500 stocks trading above their 50-day moving average and examining the proportion of index constituents achieving new highs and lows. We see improvement, per the below.

Graphic: Retrieved from Physik Invest via TradingView. Breadth black. Correlation purple.

Based on the above explanation and graphics, after the triple witching expiration of futures, stock, and index options, traders may rebalance their portfolios and sell some of the remaining volatility they’ve bid. 

As explained earlier, this will further compress volatility, reducing the potential downside and providing critical support for stocks. Considering it’s an election year and policymakers prioritize growth over instability, Karsan suggests the market may remain stable with these forces above offering an added boost. Therefore, focus on creatively structuring longer-dated call structures and financing them with other trades to amplify return potential.

If the market consolidates without breaking, we may have the groundwork for a much bigger FOMO-driven call-buying rally culminating in a blow-off. Karsan adds that the signs of this “more combustible situation” would appear when “volatility remains persistent during a rally.” To assess combustibility, observe the options market. 

We remember that calls trade at lower implied volatility than puts, particularly from all the supply. As the market moves higher, it transitions to lower implied volatility, reflected in broad measures like the VIX. If the VIX measures remain steady or higher, “that indicates that fixed-strike volatility is increasing, and if this persists, … it can unsettle volatility and create a situation where dealers themselves … begin to reduce their volatility exposure, leading to a more combustible scenario.”

To elaborate on the reducing exposure note in the previous paragraph, if there is greater demand for calls, counterparties will take on more exposure and hedge through purchases of the underlying asset. The support dealers provide will diminish once this exposure expires. If the assumption is that equity markets are currently expensive, then after another rally, there may be more room for a decline, all else being equal (a simplified perspective), thus increasing risk and combustibility.

Graphic: Outdated. Retrieved from Nomura. To help explain.

This week, we discussed a lot of information. Some of it may need to be explained better. Therefore, we look forward to your feedback. Separately, I wish my friend Giovanni Berardi congratulations on starting his newsletter. I worked with Berardi, giving him input on some of his positioning-related research. He shares his insights here. Please consider supporting him with a subscription. Cheers, Giovanni!

Categories
Commentary

Foreshocks

Good Morning! I hope you are having a good start to the week. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

There is lots of buzz around bubbles and euphoria.

Since late 2022, the Nasdaq 100 has increased by ~75%, and the S&P 500 has increased by ~50%. However, there were some bumps along the way. In mid-to-late 2023, people got worried about the economy, which boosted interest rates. But in November 2023, investors discovered the government would issue less debt, decreasing interest rates. This was good news because future profits are more valuable now when interest rates drop (i.e., lower discount rates elevate the present value of future cash flows), so stocks tend to rise.

The general idea is that stocks will likely keep rising because of the promise of AI and expected profits growing faster than stock prices. Also, people think this will happen as the economy grows and inflation decreases. But it’s not just those factors. How people invest right now is also a big reason why stocks may increase.

Much Further To Run?

The primary catalyst lies in the imbalance of investor positioning stemming from the aftermath of ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy), Fallacy Alarm elaborates. The conclusion of ZIRP reintroduced fixed-income securities as viable investments, prompting investors to boost their fixed-income allocations significantly in recent times.

Further asset rotation could manifest through a stagnant or declining stock market coupled with rising yields or through a robust stock market alongside stagnant or falling yields.

Accordingly, investors are now pursuing stocks at seemingly elevated valuations.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America via Bloomberg.

Fallacy Alarm adds color, making an interesting point on elevated valuations.

Bubbles (the hot topic) are not solely about prices; the collective portfolio allocation characterizes them. We dive further, finding there is room to expand. Per Bloomberg’s John Authers, the market is not as absurd, with the Magnificent Seven aligning more closely with the broader market than before.

Graphic: Retrieved from Ray Dalio.

Additionally, Authers says that the S&P 500 remains relatively inexpensive, with room to go based on global liquidity, subdued margin debt levels, and not overly elevated single-stock call option volumes.

Graphic: Retrieved from Ray Dalio.

“The S&P 500 looks extended in absolute terms when measured by US domestic liquidity flows, but it looks far more comfortably placed when Global Liquidity is the benchmark,” CrossBorder Capital’s Mike Howell states. “US equities have got much further to run if we can reassure ourselves that Wall Street has become the ‘World market’ for stocks. Indeed, this might be plausible given the dominance of US firms in tech and AI applications?”

Graphic: Retrieved from CrossBorder Capital via Bloomberg.

Embedded Risks To Rally

Some others are more cautious regarding the options volumes.

Nomura’s Charlie McElligott suggests the fear of a “crash up” causes a steeper call skew (i.e., the asymmetry in implied volatility levels across different strike prices). We see this with the positive relationship between spot prices and implied volatility. Additionally, volatility selling and structured product issuance may present risky dislocations.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

Some experts, like QVR Advisors, agree, note that selling volatility doesn’t offer the same returns with less risk as it used to. Instead, it’s now seen as taking on more risk for lower returns.

Graphic: Retrieved from QVR Advisors.

Options Volatility And Pricing

SpotGamma acknowledges these trends and dislocations can persist for some time.

So, what do we do about that?

In last week’s detailed “BOXXing For Beginners” letter, we discussed getting selective and trading soaring stocks using creative options structures. Remaining faithful to our approach, we traded Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) throughout the past week, utilizing a steep call skew to play upside potential at lower costs.

The outcomes for one of our accounts are detailed below.

Most positions were opened with modest credits and gradually closed with larger ones following news of its upcoming inclusion in the S&P 500. A significant portion of the profits were captured when the value of the 8 MAR 24 series reached its peak on Monday morning. During such moments, especially when nearing expiry, it’s crucial to pay attention to the market, closely monitoring the responsiveness of the spreads to underlying price action. When this responsiveness slipped in the morning, we closed all the positions, timing the peak on the structures at ~$5.00.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

Managing ‘Greeks’ Versus ‘PnL’

When it is that late, as it was in the above trade, you are more focused on managing the PnL (i.e., profit and loss) and not Greek risk (i.e., the set of risk measures used to assess the sensitivity of option prices to changes in various factors, such as underlying asset price or delta, time decay or theta, volatility or vega, and interest rates or rho).

Accordingly, despite SMCI moving higher, the same spreads traded at a ~90% discount per late-Monday pricing. On Tuesday, that discount lessened to ~60%. Regardless, the right decision was to roll into similar, albeit wider, structures in anticipation of that same index effect that drove shares of Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) higher in 2020 with its inclusion in the S&P 500.

Graphic: Retrieved from Physik Invest.

When trading these high-flying stocks, the level of risk often hinges on your exposure to vega. This risk can be mitigated by widening the gap between the closer long (+1) and farther away short (-2) options strikes. 

Here’s the rationale.

As the underlying asset moves along its skew curve, the impact of volatility on delta shifts, driven by increased implied volatility from options demand. Events, such as the market decline in 2020 and the meme stock frenzy in 2021, have illustrated how the implied volatility of out-of-the-money options can spike significantly more than the underlying asset’s movement.

Option exposures can exacerbate volatile situations through covering and hedging activities—a squeeze can occur caused by substantial movements and dramatic increases in options prices.

As mentioned last week, a straightforward method to assess the safety of such trades is by examining the pricing of fully in-the-money spreads. If these spreads trade at large credits to close, they are worth considering. Conversely, if the spreads require a debit to close, it’s advisable to steer clear. For those focused on the Greeks, aim for flat or positive exposure to vega.

Conclusions

In any case, the moral is as follows: many seem to be turning optimistic and raising their expectations while some pockets of irrationality, albeit not extreme, are popping up.

Sure, stocks may be cheap and not in a bubble to some, with added support coming from investors (re)positioning, earnings growth, and falling inflation, but there are slight shifts that may draw concern.

Such slight shifts can include the flattening of call skew, foreshadowing a waning appetite for risk, and potentially heralding market softness. Additionally, SpotGamma’s Brent Kochuba has shared data that points to lower correlations aligning with interim stock market highs, presenting more cause for caution.

While the allure of record highs may be enticing, we look to lock in some inflation protection as shared last week, participate in the upside creatively, be that in metals or high-flying stocks, and hedge using similarly creative structures on the downside, albeit much wider and with protection (e.g., Long Put Butterfly), and favorable Greeks (-delta, +gamma, +vega). There are many more details to add, but we will finish here to publish the newsletter as soon as possible. Cheers!

Graphic: Retrieved from DATATREK via Barchart. The current market conditions, again, don’t indicate a bubble.
Categories
Commentary

BOXXing For Beginners

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) beat on earnings last week, lifting the entire stock market.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Christian Fromhertz.

The chipmaker confirms it can meet lofty expectations fueled by the artificial intelligence boom, with demand for Nvidia’s newest products likely to outpace supply throughout the year. Despite mounting competition and regulatory challenges in markets like China, Nvidia pursues strategic partnerships to expand its distribution channels.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via @Marlin_Capital. NVDA eclipses $2T market capitalization, with its 12-month forward PE now at 33.

Before the earnings announcement, heightened implied volatility derived from options prices on the chipmaker’s stock indicated anticipation of significant fluctuations. The at-the-money straddles, composed of call and put options, suggested movement expectations of as much as +/-10% after earnings.

Various methods exist to estimate the expected move. One approach involves taking the value of the at-the-money straddle for the front month and multiplying it by 85%. Another entails using a narrow range of options.

The volatility skew, which will be defined later, implied that the perceived risk of movement was tilted toward the upside. In any case, staying within the anticipated movement would not favor options buyers, as we show later.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Since late 2023, traders have increasingly been hedging against or speculating on market upswings. This is evident in the higher call option implied volatility. Expectations for significant upward movement are particularly notable in the growing number of stocks where the 25 delta call implied volatility exceeds the 25 delta put implied volatility, shares Henry Schwartz of Cboe Global Markets.

To elaborate, options delta (∆) measures the change in an option’s price relative to changes in the underlying asset’s price. It indicates the option’s sensitivity to the underlying asset’s price movements. A delta of 0.50 means that for every $1 change in the underlying asset’s price, the option’s price would change by $0.50 in the same direction. The skew reflects the difference in implied volatility between out-of-the-money call and put options with the same delta. 

When the 25 delta call implied volatility surpasses that of the 25 delta put implied volatility, a more pronounced positive skew suggests traders are willing to pay a premium for calls. Conversely, if the 25 delta put implied volatility exceeds that of the 25 delta call implied volatility, often observed in products like the S&P 500 (due to concerns about protecting equity downside), there is a negative skew or stronger inclination to pay a higher price for put options.

Graphic: Retrieved from Henry Schwartz.

This persistent fear of missing out on sudden upward movements manifests a cascading effect when markets move higher, says Nomura Americas Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott.

“The key to equities seemingly being able to keep shaking off nascent pullbacks? Well outside of the ongoing ‘AI  euphoria’ theme and de-grossing of shorts, … it’s been all about the Pavlovian ‘options selling’ flows, which continue to suppress [implied volatility].”

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura.

As explained by McElligott, these “options selling flows” have the potential to amplify momentum. For instance, when traders or customers purchase call spreads, as they are large, the counterparties or dealers are left with a short skew, negative delta position that loses money if implied volatility rises or markets rise. In response to a rising market, dealers may manage their delta by selling put options or buying call options, stocks, or futures. Adding these positive delta hedges helps propel the market into uncharted territory during swift movements.

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura.

As validation, after Nvidia Corporation’s stock surged about 10% post-earnings, Bloomberg reported that “to fully re-hedge all open option positions coming into the day, 51 million shares, or 91% of the daily average,” would need to be traded. Bloomberg added that the March 15 $680 call, February 23 $700, and $750 calls experienced the most significant changes in the delta before the market opening.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Global_Macro or @Marcomadness2.

Observing SpotGamma’s real-time options hedging impact measure HIRO, the chipmaker was boosted partly on positive flows from the hedging of call options, as shown by the orange line below, while put options trading had a limited effect, as indicated by the blue line. The re-hedging activity positively affected the stock on Thursday post-earnings and had a pressuring effect on Friday, owing to the short-datedness of some of the options exposure traders initiated.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. 

While mentioning pressures, see below the volatility skew before (green) and after (grey) earnings. 

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

Short-dated options with very high strikes (e.g., 900+) and close expiration dates (e.g., ten days) struggled to hold their value. SpotGamma shared that the pricing of near-the-money $785 calls expiring on March 15 returned to their previous levels just a week before earnings. Since the actual movement closely matched the expected movement, there was little justification for options well above the market (i.e., +30%) to retain their value.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via SpotGamma.

At Physik Invest, we foresaw such a situation and executed 100-point wide 1×2 call ratio spreads between the 900s and 1000s for a credit of approximately 0.90. We closed these positions the next day for an additional credit of 0.50 when the 1000 strike options failed to keep their value as good as the closer 900 strike options. The resulting profit was a 1.40 credit per spread.

Graphic: Via Banco Santander SA (NYSE: SAN) research. The return profile, at expiry, of a 1×2 (buy 1 and sell 2 further away) ratio spread.

Please be aware that similar trades are present in other high-flying products, albeit less widespread than in 2021 during the meme-stock trend. A simple way to determine whether such trades are safe is to check the pricing of fully in-the-money spreads. If the spreads trade at substantial credits to close, they are worth considering. However, if the spreads require a debit to close, it’s best to avoid them. In the case of Nvidia, the 100-point spread was priced at 25.00 in credit to close the day of earnings.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

Generally speaking, this trend in implied volatility is something that may continue. Kris Sidial from The Ambrus Group says the trend, which masks the risks of short volatility under the hood, such as those tied to risk-management practices, is driven by several factors not limited to the following:

(1) Increased demand for call options.

(2) Larger institutions seeking volatility as a hedge against rising risk exposure as the S&P 500 climbs. 

(3) Significant market movements make it difficult for implied volatility to decrease significantly.

Must Read: Two Major Risks Investors Should Watch Out For

Graphic: Retrieved from The Ambrus Group.

As such, Sidial suggests that “there is significant value in embracing volatility in both directions,” hedging against geopolitical and economic uncertainties while also capitalizing on the market upside. As discussed last week, we focus on leveraging elevated skew to reduce the cost of bullish trades (e.g., metals). Additionally, we plan to replenish our long put skew by acquiring put spreads in equities as a precaution against potential risks ahead, mainly local market peaks this time of year.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Tavi Costa.

With recent data dissuading anticipated cuts, there’s room to safeguard cash at higher rates for longer. 

One trade structure to help us do so is the box spread, which includes benefits such as a convenience yield, capital efficiencies achieved through portfolio margining, easy entry/exit on an exchange through most retail brokers, and potential 60% long-term and 40% short-term tax treatment.

Graphic: Retrieved via Alpha Architect. 

Like a Treasury bill, the loan structure combines a bull call spread and a bear put spread. In a bull call spread, an investor purchases a call option and sells another at a higher strike price. A bear put spread involves buying a put option and selling another at a lower strike price. The lower (X1) and higher strikes (X2) match for a box spread, with all legs sharing the same expiration date.

Graphic: Retrieved from OCC.

In calculating the loan rate, we take, for example, a recent box spread trade of Physik Invest’s: BOT +1 IRON CONDOR SPX 100 (Quarterlys) 31 DEC 24 3000/6000/6000/3000 CALL/PUT @2867.90 CBOE.

[(WIDTH−PRICE)/Price](365/DTE) = Implied Interest Rate

Where:

WIDTH: Distance between higher and lower strikes

PRICE: The price of the box spread

DTE: Days until the trade matures

[(3000-2867.90)/2867.90](365/319) = 0.0527036866 = 5.27%

We lend $286,790.00, at a risk-free rate of 5.27%, in exchange for $13,210.00 of interest at maturity. You can track box spread yields more quickly using tools like boxtrades.com. Such insights open up several strategic avenues for traders.

One approach is investing about 95% of your cash into box spreads to return the principal at maturity, risking the 5% interest you make on trades with a limited downside (e.g., SPX bull call spread). 

A more preferable option exists for portfolio margin traders. Portfolio margining is a risk-based approach to determining margin requirements in a customer’s account, aligning collateral with the overall portfolio risk. Portfolio margining considers offsets between correlated products, calculating margin requirements based on projected losses. This approach may lower margin requirements, allowing for more efficient capital utilization.

As portfolio margin traders, we retain our buying power due to the minimal directional risk associated with box spreads, allocating it to other margin-intensive trades. To illustrate, if such a trader initially invests $100,000 in box spreads, they are left with $0 in cash and $100,000 in buying power available for margin-intensive trades (e.g., synthetic long stock or the purchase of an at-the-money call and simultaneous sale of an at-the-money put). You get your inflation protection while participating 100% in up-and-down market movements. Why not, right?

The point of the above passage is that much of what you see online can be done yourself in a tax, margin, and cost-efficient way. Alternatively, you can be hands-off, investing in money markets and CDs or complicated yet cool products like the popularized Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BATS: BOXX), which has grabbed attention for its tax arbitrage through complex strategies and loopholes.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Eric Balchunas.

With BOXX, you’re investing in something as safe as short-term Treasury bills, but you can get your money back anytime and enjoy better tax treatment than Treasury bills. Bloomberg’s Matt Levine has an excellent write-up on the mechanics of BOXX, which you can read here.

We digress. You can do more with your unused cash and buying power when following the methods outlined earlier and as we put well in our “Investing In A High Rate World” report published in April 2023. There, we discussed return stacking utilizing Nasdaq call ratio spreads and S&P 500 box spreads, two trades that continue to kill it this year.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bespoke Investment Group.

We choose these structures, which have limited losses in case of market downside, for the following reasons: There is considerable support for the market, but this support appears fragile. For one, we refer to record-level dispersion trading, which involves the sale of index options and buying options in individual stocks. 

It’s the same short volatility exposure Sidial has warned us about. With some stocks realizing substantial differences in movement from the index, this booming trade may have gone too far, setting the stage for a potential market reversal.

The situation resembles the period leading up to Volmageddon when short-volatility strategies backfired. Implied correlations are low, and if a market shock occurs, investors may be forced to close out their trades, which could feed volatility. As was in the case leading up to Volmageddon, however, volatility can cluster and mean-revert for longer.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Tallbacken Capital Advisors.

.

Categories
Commentary

Reversion To The Meme

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

After a period of taking the stairs up, markets took the elevator down last week. Through Tuesday, the S&P 500 fell over 2.5% on a Consumer Price Index (CPI) print, which signaled higher-than-expected inflation. Internally, the selling was heavy.

Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView. Market Internals as taught by Shadowtrader’s Peter Reznicek.

Additionally, options were repriced in a big way.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Options Insight.

Let’s digress. 

Recall that options implied volatility is a measure of the market’s expectation of the future volatility of an underlying asset, as reflected by the supply and demand of options themselves. Higher implied volatility indicates more significant expected price fluctuations.

Options implied volatility skew refers to the unevenness in implied volatility levels across different strike prices. Steep, smile-looking, or v-shaped volatility skew reflects a scenario where increased market volatility disproportionately impacts farther away strike options due to (expected) losses from more frequent delta rebalancing in a moving market. Options traders assign higher implied volatility to those farther away strike options to compensate for increased risk/cost, often enabling savvy traders to exploit these variations to reduce their hedging costs.

Moreover, before last week’s drop, the S&P 500’s implied volatility skew was subdued, as indicated by the grey-shaded area below. Tuesday’s decline coincided with increased options trading activity and demand, leading to a notable upward shift in skew. Distant S&P 500 put options experienced significant increases in implied volatility (see the below grey line moving away from the shaded area).

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Volatility skew for S&P 500 options expiring March 15, 2024.

Though skew remains elevated, broader implied volatility measures, such as the Cboe Volatility Index or VIX, declined as rapidly as markets rallied in the days following Tuesday’s downturn.

What’s happening?

Despite further negative economic indicators, such as hot producer prices or weaker retail sales and manufacturing output, markets surged strongly, closing the week almost unchanged. Beyond significant investor inflows into stocks, totaling approximately $16 billion on Wednesday, according to Bank of America Corporation, analysis of S&P options positioning revealed mechanical demand for the S&P 500, as highlighted by SqueezeMetrics. Higher implied volatility strengthened an automatic buying mechanism, supporting markets.

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics. Dealer S&P 500 Vanna Exposure or VEX.

This phenomenon is partially attributed to the significant options selling discussed in our recent newsletters, acknowledging the warnings issued by Cem Karsan of Kai Volatility and Kris Sidial of The Ambrus Group. Essentially, there’s been a rush among options sellers to enter into sizable positions, exemplified by the substantial options selling activity observed last week. UBS Group highlighted the persistence of this concerning toxic flow, noting aggressive trader actions, such as the sale of “70K of Thursday expiry 4120 puts at 0.05 on Wednesday.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

The estimated risk profile of this position is provided below (please allow for a margin of error of a day or two due to expiry). Essentially, it’s unfavorable, with the option seller at risk of losing much money if the market drops or implied volatility increases. Please be aware that we’re assessing this position independently, without knowledge of the option seller’s overall portfolio, including potential risk offsets from other positions they may hold.

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform using the Analyze function.

Customers favoring such positive delta “short skew” positions prompt dealers on the other side to assume a negative delta (i.e., make money if the market is lower or implied volatility is higher) “long skew” or “long options” position, which they may manage through the sale of put options or the purchase of call options, underlying stock shares, or futures for hedging purposes. For a deeper understanding of these mechanisms, refer to SqueezeMetrics’ paper, “The Implied Order Book.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SqueezeMetrics.

This all happened during a seasonally weak period. We’ll go past the positioning side of things in a moment, so bear with me, but you can see the drop-off in options deltas following mid-February below.

Graphic: Retrieved from ConvexValue.

In essence, despite the anticipated reduction in options-based support, which Cem Karsan describes as a “window of non-strength” or a scenario conducive to increased volatility, the market’s reaction to Tuesday’s drop stemmed volatility. Observing these dynamics in real-time, here’s how we responded.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

We had proactively positioned ourselves for a potentially weaker February, capitalizing on overlooked hedge opportunities outlined in recent newsletters—specifically, put spreads like butterflies. Others did similar, with Nomura Americas Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott noting increased buying of put butterfly spreads in recent weeks (please see our late January and early February letters).

Depending on their setup (including the distance between strikes, the distance from the spot price, and the expiration timeframe), these spreads were positioned to profit from market declines. When the drop occurred, the unbalanced, very far out-of-the-money structures were priced to be closed at a small debit loss when the skew elevated substantially. Utilizing real-time analysis, we concluded it was opportune to increase our exposure to these far out-of-the-money units, capitalizing on the surge in implied volatility while cashing in on the closer spreads priced for a credit profit.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

As markets recovered, we closed the recently initiated riskier spreads, freeing up buying power for opportunities elsewhere, such as in NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI), where a significant volatility skew, driven by heightened call options trading, enabled us to generate credit from short-dated spread trades.

By Friday’s end, we achieved one of our most successful weeks of the year, boosting our confidence and reinforcing our patience with underperforming trades, like the put butterfly hedges. PAY-tience!

Graphic: Retrieved from TD Ameritrade’s thinkorswim platform.

What motivated our actions? Let’s elaborate.

Tactically, we favor owning options to express our opinions efficiently selling options further out to reduce costs. Occasionally, we will utilize a ratio, such as selling two options for every one purchased. For those less experienced, simplicity often proves effective. Consider straightforward approaches like purchasing a wide put vertical, entailing buying a put, and selling a put at some greater distance. Depending on your position, the returns may come in at multiples of each unit of risk undertaken.

Furthermore, the speculative trading and crowded positions in equities (as previously discussed in this and prior newsletters), along with the persistent volatility skew (as indicated by the yellow line compared to the grey line below), imply that hedging strategies (such as owning longer-dated calls and selling stock/futures as a combination, or using put option spread strategies to hedge shares) may continue to be appealing.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Volatility skew for S&P 500 options expiring March 15, 2024.

In terms of what to hedge, as highlighted by Fallacy Alarm, mid-February traditionally signals local market peaks due to significant cash injections followed by selling pressure to cover tax obligations. Additionally, a dilemma presents itself: should the focus be on combating inflation or stimulating growth? Presently, the data would dissuade anticipated rate cuts, though such actions might be contemplated if the Personal Consumption Expenditure, a key metric, points to lower price increases, particularly in services. Current interest rate projections suggest a bimodal scenario with a low probability of sudden rate declines.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

As further context, John Authers of Bloomberg says there remains a risk of overheating or a scenario where the economy remains robust, eventually forcing the Federal Reserve (Fed) to tighten policies until it precipitates a recession. This is in disagreement with TS Lombard. They question whether the Fed’s current stance is overly restrictive, while Bob Elliott of Unlimited Funds suggests that rates may decrease in response to slowing growth. Eventually, the persistent inflation stemming from structural factors could prompt subsequent rate hikes driven by increased funding needs.

Graphic: Retrieved from Sven Henrich.

Traders must remain vigilant, adopting strategic approaches to hedge exuberance and so-called windows of non-strength. Should there be “a stronger catalyst than a telegraphed CPI print,” says Kris Sidial, then “both tails and skew are likely to perform well,” with any rally, given the short-volatility, likely to unsettle positioning, leading dealers to boost momentum and whipsaw. In other words, much lower or higher markets, coupled with more demand for puts or calls respectively, means dealers take on more short volatility risk, which they adjust for by repricing options higher and hedging with underlying asset sales (in the case of puts) or purchases (in the case of calls).

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Corporation.

In conclusion, we remain mindful that it’s an election year, which could lead to heightened monetary and fiscal support in response to any weaknesses. While we maintain a positive outlook over the long term, we’re less optimistic in the short term.

This week, our attention is directed toward protecting our cash by rolling our remaining S&P 500 box spreads (acting as synthetic T-bills without impacting our buying power). We aim to secure these interest rates, keep a close watch on high-performing assets like silver, and replenish our long put skew (i.e., purchasing put spreads) in equities to hedge against potential vulnerabilities ahead. Following earnings announcements, we may resume engagement with companies such as Nvidia.

Graphic: Example of trade structuring. Retrieved from Physik Invest. This does not accurately represent this newsletter writer’s position. However, it is close. Note that one may own stock on top of this and view positions in aggregate.

If you’re wondering what’s up with the newsletter formatting over the past weeks, we are trying stuff. Let us know what you like and don’t like. Cheers, and have a good week! And, finally, if you can, share!

The cover photo was retrieved from a RidgeHaven Capital post on Seeking Alpha.

Categories
Commentary

Strategies For Economic And Political Disorder

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

While scrolling through online news, some may relate to the idea that, sometimes, a lot can happen quickly. In other words, “There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen.” This feeling was especially noticeable during last week’s “Volmageddon” anniversary, when the VIX skyrocketed, causing significant market disruptions. Skeptics and worriers were vocal about everything, from problems in how markets work to possible economic and political troubles.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Interactive Brokers’ Steve Sosnick. Pictured is “Volmageddon.”

A highlight was Tucker Carlson’s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Throughout the conversation, besides uncovering insights into the Ukraine conflict’s ties to Poland, it became evident that not only the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) but also other countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates, collectively representing over 30% of global GDP and 45% of the world’s population, are diminishing their dependence on the US dollar.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Putin suggested that the US effectively undermines the dollar, misusing its position as the issuer of the world’s primary reserve currency. This shift, previously discussed in our newsletters on January 4 and 5 of 2023, reflects broader changes in the global economy, carrying significant implications for the future. Let’s break down how.

Countries that share ideological alignment with BRICS are actively working to decrease their dependence on the US dollar and mitigate risks associated with (potential) sanctions. One practice involves trading resources for development without relying on US dollars for funding. For example, China securing oil at discounts by utilizing its renminbi currency allows Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations to convert it into investments, development projects, and gold. Further implementing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) streamlines interstate payments, an alternative to the Western-dominated financial system.

This gradually diminishing dependence on the West complicates challenges like inflation. Nations can boost their weights in currency baskets by encumbering and re-exporting commodities in strict supply. Accordingly, as Zoltan Pozsar shares, “the US dollar and Treasury securities will likely be dealing with issues they never had to deal with before: less demand, not more; more competition, not less.” Monetary policymakers can’t fight this trend alone; instead, for one, Western governments can boost energy production (not just productivity), states Rana Foroohar, global business columnist and associate editor at the Financial Times.

“Petrodollars also accelerated the creation of a more speculative, debt-fuelled economy in the US, as banks flush with cash created all sorts of new financial ‘innovations,’ and an influx of foreign capital allowed the US to maintain a larger deficit,” shared Foroohar. “That trend may now start to go into reverse. Already, there are fewer foreign buyers for US Treasuries. If the petroyuan takes off, it would feed the fire of de-dollarisation. China’s control of more energy reserves and the products that spring from them could be an important new contributor to inflation in the West. It’s a slow-burn problem.”

Graphic: Retrieved from VoxEU.

Regarding the market functioning narratives, David Einhorn, founder of Greenlight Capital, believes markets are fundamentally flawed, blaming the rise of passive investing and algorithmic trading. According to Einhorn, these methods prioritize short-term profits over long-term value creation.

To explain, we consider Nvidia’s case. Over the past five years, its weighting in the S&P 500 increased by 3.7%. This growth was driven by active managers who recognized the company’s value and bought shares, consequently boosting its market capitalization. This increase in market capitalization, in turn, elevated the stock’s weighting in the index.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Passive funds create a problem because they purchase stocks regardless of price when they receive new investments, as Bloomberg’s John Authers explains. Ultimately, “Passive decreases the inelasticity of a stock as it grows in market cap,” Simplify’s Michael Green shares. “Lower inelasticity, more extreme price response to the same volume of flow.”

As a company’s value increases, passive funds buy more of its stock, increasing prices. This trend is particularly concerning in the technology sector, where the flow of funds into passive investments pushes those stocks even further from value, stoking bubble fears. 

Moreover, weakness beneath the surface is hidden, as seen in the comparison between the stocks above their 50-day moving average and the S&P 500.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bespoke Investment Group.

The US stock market is approximately 70% of the world’s total market value, despite the US economy contributing less than 20% to global economic output, Authers adds.

“These valuations cannot make sense,” he elaborates. Markets imply that “over the next 20 years, less than 20% of the world economy will earn three times more profits than the remaining 70%,” Charles Gave of Gavekal Research says. It is a significant multi-decade bet on a small portion of the global economy generating most profits, primarily through the sustained dominance of technology giants.

Graphic: Retrieved from Damped Spring Advisors.

Despite the strength and profitability of these companies persisting, with firms beating earnings estimates by about a margin of 7%, says Nasdaq economist Phil Mackintosh, whether their fundamentals alone justify such continued dominance is questioned.

Still, many experienced fund managers, who would typically bet against tech stocks, are refraining from doing so. Einhorn highlighted the costliness of taking such positions due to passive investing. As a result, his fund has shifted focus towards companies with lower market capitalizations relative to earnings and strong cash flows to support share buybacks.

According to Damped Spring Advisors’ Andy Constan, the trend towards indexation will continue as all investors have not fully embraced passive investing. If everyone were to adopt passive investing fully and no one bought stocks outside the S&P 500, companies not in the index would lose access to the public market, impacting funding for PE/VC markets and capital formation.

Though index investing may eventually face challenges as money moves from expensive stocks to cheaper, non-indexed ones, we can stick with it. Even if active managers do better than the index and counteract the distortions caused by passive investing, many of their stocks are still in those indexes. Again, more of a reason to invest in index funds.

similar reasoning can be applied to the growing short volatility trade, which the likes of The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial have generated much buzz around.

Even though volatility was very low in 2017, the smart move was to sell it. As Sidial explainsvolatility can have two modesIf you sold volatility in late 2017 to early 2018 when the VIX was in the 9-11 range, you made money because it tends to cluster. There’s a time when it’s wise for traders to take risks and go against the flow to make profits. However, there’s also a time when the flow is too big, dangerous, and not sensitive to price, and it doesn’t make sense to take that risk by buying low volatility and hoping for a big win, he shared in a recent update.

At this point in the newsletter, it’s apparent that timing matters. Manufacturing and employment appear strong, and overall, the economy is in a good place in the short- to medium-term, with above-zero rates contributing to the solid economic growth

Graphic: Retrieved from Fidelity via Jurrien Timmer, Director of Global Macro at Fidelity. “This chart shows that during most cycles, the baton gets passed from P/E-expansion to earnings growth a few quarters into a new bull market cycle.  We appear to be there.”

The context states rates and stocks can stay higher for longer. On the flip side, we know volatility can stay lower longer, though its falling from lower and lower levels has less of a positive impact on stocks. Positioning is stretched, and the focus is shifting from worries about missed opportunities to safeguarding against potential downturns.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

“We tend to see this type of movement before a reversal,” Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan says, noting that volatility may rise, with the S&P 500 peaking as high as $5,100. “The speed of the move starts getting more accelerated towards the top because people start betting against, saying, ‘this is crazy, these values are too high, and the market needs to come down.’”

What Karsan describes is a more combustible situation arising from the market and volatility syncing.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

To measure potential volatility, check the options market. Calls usually have lower implied volatility (IVOL) than puts. As the market rises, IVOL typically drops, reflected in broader IVOL measures like the VIX. If these broad IVOL measures rise, it suggests fixed-strike volatility is also rising. If this persists, it could unsettle dealers, leading them to reduce their exposure to volatility, boosting the momentum and whipsaw.

More demand for calls means counterparties take on more risk, hedged with underlying asset purchases. If this hedging support is withdrawn, it may increase vulnerability to a downturn. Still, we must remember that it’s an election year, and there could be more monetary and fiscal support for any weakness.

Graphic: Retrieved from Morgan Stanley via Tier1 Alpha.

As George Soros said, “It’s not whether you’re right or wrong that’s important, but how much money you make when you’re right and how much you lose when you’re wrong.” Given the low volatility environment and the performance of skew with such aggressive equity positioning and divergences beneath the surface of the indexes, consider the lower-cost structures we’ve discussed in newslettersminimizing equity losses by employing the appropriate unbalanced spread.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma on February 11, 2024. Volatility skew for options expiring on March 15, 2024, on February 5 (grey) and February 9 (blue).
Categories
Commentary

Bubblicious

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Optimism from earnings growth among large stocks overshadows concerns about instability abroadquarterly debt sales, and the diminishing likelihood of an immediate interest rate cut.

“The U.S. is doing pretty well,” Yardeni Research founder Ed Yardeni remarks, noting a shift from speculation about interest rates allows the market to focus on fundamentals. “Right now, the fundamentals are good for the economy. And, there’s plenty of hype around about.”

Multiple rate cuts totaling nearly 125 basis points in the next year remain expected. This seems extreme unless there’s a market crash, says Harley Bassman, inventor of the MOVE Index measuring bond market volatility. Bassman believes current pricing reflects a bimodal scenario, with an 85% chance rates remain stable and a 15% chance they drop to 1%. Combining these probabilities, the market arrives at the anticipated cuts by year-end.

Naturally, markets are cyclical, moving from one extreme to another. Despite the fundamentals being in order, a lack of broad participation is evident in the more significant number of declining stocks than advancing ones. This situation, resembling patterns seen during the late ‘90s infotech-and-telecom boom, is frequently an indicator of less resilient future returns.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Global Research.

Ryan Detrick of Carson Group notes that February typically experiences less momentum than January, often due to reinvestment and bonus inflows. Data shows that when the S&P 500 recorded a 20% gain for the year, February tended to underperform, especially in the latter half of the month, which typically marked the weakest two-week period of the year.

Graphic: Retrieved from SentimenTrader via Jason Goepfert.

While the same volatility-suppressing trades detailed in last week’s letter continue to support markets where they are ceteris paribus (where customers sell volatility, and dealers hedge by buying stock/futures during declines and selling during strength), there has been “SPX/SPY downside buying (put flys) and ongoing VIX call buying,” Nomura Americas Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott writes. This steepens implied volatility skew, benefitting the underappreciated hedge opportunities shared in Physik Invest’s Market Intelligence letters.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma on February 5, 2024.

The recent repricing has allowed unbalanced, out-of-the-money options spreads to retain their value better amid ongoing market gains. The focus has shifted from worries about missed opportunities to safeguarding against potential downturns. This shift may be attributed to concerns beyond poor market breadth and the possibility of localized issues in places like China impacting global markets. These include geopolitical tensionsturbulence in specific capital market segments, lingering effects of extensive government spending, and looming debt crises.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma on February 1, 2024.

With the popularity of yield-enhancing trades like selling options, there’s concern that if significant market movements materialize, a greater share of end users will shift to buying options, indirectly exacerbating market volatility and downside.

Graphic: Retrieved from QVR Advisors.

To explain this phenomenon, we start with the options delta, which measures how much an option’s price will change for every $1 change in the underlying asset’s price. When end users sell put options, market makers buy them, assuming a negative delta stance, thus prompting them to acquire the underlying asset to hedge (which has a positive delta). Conversely, when end users buy put options, dealers sell them, taking on a positive delta. Consequently, they need to sell the underlying asset (which has a negative delta) to hedge. In sharp and volatile market declines, options sellers may opt to cover their positions by purchasing options, thereby diminishing stability as counterparties hedge in line with the market movement.

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura.

Kris Sidial from The Ambrus Group emphasizes second-order effects are further amplified due to the large scale of options selling, adding concentration among market makers as another risk to watch. Scott Rubner, a tactical specialist at Goldman Sachs Group, concurs current market problems, and the unwind of stretched positioning may lead to a weak February.

Categories
Commentary

Turning Nickels Into Dollars: A Winning Strategy For Market Crashes

Good Morning! I hope you had a great weekend and enjoy today’s letter. I would be so honored if you could comment and/or share this post. Cheers!

Risk appetite in the last months was fueled by the emergence of a “goldilocks disinflation thesis,” describes Marko Kolanovic of JPMorgan Chase & Co. This thesis envisions a no-recession scenario where central banks cut rates early, especially in the lead-up to elections.

The market is banking on such anticipatory movement by the Federal Reserve, pricing five rate cuts and the target interest rate moving from 525-550 to 400-425 basis points by year-end. With the backdrop of easing liquidity conditions through 2025 and continuing economic growth, equity investors are positioning for a broader rally. This has led to churn and a loss of momentum.

Graphic: Retrieved from Carson Investment Research via Ryan Detrick.

Though historical trends encourage optimism, Kolanovic is concerned markets are overlooking geopolitical events, such as the Houthi shipping attacksexercises near the Suwałki Gap, and Russia’s testing of electronic warfare. Despite these potential disruptors, atypically low volatility skew and implied correlation indicate a lack of market responsiveness and positioning for less movement.

Recall skew reflects a scenario where increased market volatility disproportionately impacts farther away strike options due to losses from more frequent delta rebalancing in a moving market, leading option sellers to assign higher implied volatility to those strikes to compensate for increased risk. The relationship between index volatility and its components involves both individual volatilities and correlation, with implied correlation as a valuable indicator for pricing dynamics between index options and their components and trading volatility dispersion.

Appearing on The Market Huddle, Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan emphasized the impact of more structured product issuance and investor volatility selling on index levels, describing how it pins the index and lowers correlation. When a dealer, bank, or market maker on the other side owns options, they need to buy the market when it goes down and sell when it goes up, keeping the index tight and realized volatility low. Much less of this, or even the opposite, is happening in single stocks, so they aren’t experiencing the same level of suppression.

Graphic: Retrieved from The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial. Higher short Vega exposure, growing derivative income fund and equity short vol hedge fund AUM, a larger auto-callable market, and record-high dispersion trading flow suppress index vol, posing significant risks.

“As dealers buy and sell index exposure, market makers will attempt to keep the index level and the underlying basket in line via arbitrage constraints,” Newfound Research well explained in their Liquidity Cascades paper. “If dealer hedging has suppressed index-level volatility, but underlying components are still exhibiting idiosyncratic volatility, then the only reconciliation is a decline in correlation.”

SpotGamma’s Brent Kochuba weighs in, noting low correlation typically aligns with interim stock market highs, presenting a potential cause for caution. Examining data since January 2018, Kochuba points out that the SPX’s average close-to-close change is 88 basis points, with the open-to-close average at 70 basis points. This analysis suggests the current SPX implied volatility (IV) is relatively low. While low IV levels can persist, the concern arises as current readings hint at overbought conditions.

“These low IVs can last for some time, but the general point here is that current readings are starting to suggest overbought conditions as index vols are priced for risk-less perfection, and single stock vols expand due to upside call chasing.”

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Short-dated S&P 500 implied volatility is compressed. Updated Sunday, January 28, 2024.

Nomura Cross-Asset Macro Strategist Charlie McElligott explains selling volatility, which continues to attract money as it’s been profitable, is a stabilizing trade in most cases. Kris Sidial, Co-Chief Investment Officer at The Ambrus Group, warns it may end spectacularly in his most recent appearances. The situation in China is a cautionary example, where stock volatility triggered a destructive selling cycle as market participants grappled with structured product risk management.

Graphic: Retrieved from Reuters.

Accordingly, for those who perceive a meaningful chance of movement, there is value in owning options, Goldman Sachs Group says, noting they expect more movement than is priced.

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group via VolSignals.

Karsan, drawing parallels to the unwind of short volatility and dispersion trade from February to March of 2020, says the still-crowded trade can be compared to two sumo wrestlers or colossal plates on the Earth’s core exerting immense pressure against each other. While the trade may appear balanced and continue far longer, the accumulated pressures pose significant risks.

Graphic: Retrieved from JPMorgan Chase & Co via @jaredhstocks.

Major crashes happen when entities must trade volatility and options. Often, the trigger is the inability to cover the margin and meet regulatory requirements, causing a cascading effect.

Karsan, drawing on 25 years of experience, notes a precursor to a crash is a weakening supply of margin puts, particularly the highly convex and far out-of-the-money ones. These options play a significant role during stressful market periods, acting as indicators and drivers of impending crashes. The focus is on their convexity rather than whether they will be in the money, as the margin requirements become a determining factor in their impact on market dynamics. History shows a minor catalyst can lead to a dramatic unwind, turning one week to expiry $0.05 to $0.15 S&P 500 put options into $10.00 overnight.

“Prior to the XIV crash day, … going into the close the last hour, we saw nickel, ten, and five-cent options trade up to about $0.50 and $0.70. They really started to pop in the last hour. And then, the next day, we opened up and they were worth $10.00. You don’t see them go from a nickel to $0.50 very often. If you do, don’t sell them. Buy them, which is the next trade.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Setting aside the pessimistic narrative, the current scenario favors continued ownership of risk assets. Cautious optimism surrounds this week’s Quarterly Refunding Announcement (QRA), “depending on how much bill issuance is scaled back and on the absolute funding needs,” CrossBorder Capital explained, coupled with Fed-speak and anticipation of cutting interest rates on falling inflation later this year. Still, according to Unlimited Funds ‘ Bob Elliott, predicting outcomes following this week’s releases lacks an advantage; instead, in this environment of churn, momentum loss, and indicators like low correlation and volatility, last week’s trades for managing potential downside stick out, particularly vis-à-vis volatility skew.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma. Updated Sunday, January 28, 2024.
Categories
Commentary

Take The Money And Run

In their Daily Observation, dated January 4, 2000, Bridgewater Associates argued each decade was inclined to be more dissimilar to the preceding one.

“Most people who experienced consistent reinforcement for ten years were inclined to believe that this would continue indefinitely,” the authors Ray Dalio et al. said, pointing to the situation that preceded stock investors’ disappointment in the 1970s, akin to present perceptions. Investors took untimely risks that proved costly. By the late 1970s, influenced by the trauma of inflation, they shifted towards hedge assets.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

The report underscored a significant point: “Thirty years of prosperity and peace created a faith that our problems will be resolved.” Does this sound familiar? Dalio speculates we will soon test the resilience of the existing order and the containment, or lack thereof, of international conflicts. 

Let’s take a step back. What has transpired?

Over many decades, policymakers orchestrated a “growth engine,” nurturing innovation and globalization, inadvertently widening the wealth gap. The urgency to fix disparities, heightened by a pandemic, suggests the next decade will unfold differently, marked by rolling crises.

Inflation & protectionism & conflict, oh my! 

Graphic: Retrieved from TIME. China’s emergence as a global competitor is visualized.

This secular narrative is meticulously explored in our “Climbing A Wall Of Worry” letter. Resolving supply-chain disruptions and commodity deflation helped alleviate overall inflation concerns in the short term. Fiscal boosts, low unemployment, and wage inflation bolstered economic resilience. Pundits are now invoking terms like “soft-landing” and “Goldilocks,” capturing the current sentiment.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Global Research.

“The picture that market prices are now painting is for inflation to fall to central banks’ targets, for real growth to be moderate, and for central banks to lower interest rates fairly quickly—so the markets are now reflecting a Goldilocks economy,” Dalio says himself. 

The economic outlook for 2024 seems less impressive despite lingering market support from previous stimulations. Market prices indicate five cuts, reducing the target rate range from 525-550 to 400-425 basis points. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller, who generally holds hawkish views, concurs that “the FOMC will be able to lower the target range for the federal funds rate this year.” However, he cautions against anticipating as many cuts, asserting that, despite noisy data, current policy is appropriate and should persist in exerting downward pressure on demand.

Graphic: Retrieved from CME Group on January 21, 2024.

In a different scenario, where higher real interest rates persist, it would negatively affect the economy. A hard landing would be risked, Fabian Wintersberger believes, leading to a fall in GDP and escalating debt ratios. Regardless of the path, the private sector will likely reduce investment and continue deleveraging for as long as feasible.

Graphic: Retrieved from Simplify Asset Management. High Yield Index Years to Maturity suggests organizations find refinancing or reissuing debt difficult, primarily due to the high costs associated with the risk-free component. This situation is reminiscent of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), where uncertainty in credit markets hindered entities from refinancing.

What does all this mean for the stock market? Investors across all time frames are ultra-enthusiastic, bidding products like the S&P 500 to new highs. However, breadth could be more exciting, judging by the Russell 2000 and equal-weighted indexes.

Graphic: Retrieved from marketcharts.com via Callum Thomas.

Such is the takeaway when looking at market internals also.

Graphic: Retrieved from StockCharts.com.

So, what’s the story? Bloomberg says, “This isn’t your father’s S&P 500. Don’t worry about valuations.”

Typically, these statements raise promote caution. However, investors seem to see no alternative at the moment. The market is fueled by enthusiastic buying of a handful of stocks “accumulating greater and greater weighting.” While the forward P/E of the equal-weight S&P 500 aligns with pre-pandemic averages, the so-called Magnificent 7, steering the well-known S&P 500 (i.e., the SPX), boasts a higher value at 28.

Accordingly, over the shorter term, there are risks, including the market pausing here to “demand some deliverables” and the passage of options expiries last week. 

“The reflexive nature of the market tells us that what we are witnessing here is much more mechanical than anything and probably has nothing to do with what is happening in the real world,” Mott Capital Management’s Michael Kramer discusses.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

SpotGamma explains there was “rhythmic buying” of options “related to the QYLD Nasdaq BuyWrite ETF, which rolls the Thursday before monthly OPEX.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Michael Kramer. Notice the amount of call open interest.

Kramer, aligning with views expressed by individuals such as Cem Karsan from Kai Volatility, anticipates a potential reversal. The premise is based on the assumption that investors owned a substantial share of call options. With a reduction in their quantity and a decrease in the risk they pose to counterparts engaged in hedging through long stocks and futures, there is expected to be diminished “mechanical” support in the subsequent weeks. SpotGamma emphasizes that Monday is the final day for any options expiration effect.

“The structural supply and demand imbalance should end on Friday,” Karsan states. “I would be careful chasing this tech up here, in particular, if we see some weakness going forward like we’ve been talking about.” 

The crucial factor is the amount of “vol supply” emerging from this event, which could counteract “vol demand” (recall that investors often seek protection through options or volatility, the all-encompassing term). This counteraction may postpone weakness, setting the stage for a more significant decline later in Q1, as highlighted by Karsan.

It’s important to note that a substantial market position involves hedging equity with short-call options and long-put options. Options prices may decrease with increased volatility supply, leading to the counterpart’s re-hedging of this position by buying back underlying stock and futures hedges (i.e., if a counterpart is short futures against an SPX long-call and short-put position, they will buy futures to rebalance their delta as implied volatility falls).

Graphic: Retrieved from Nomura Securities International.

“Can that counter the lack of positive flows, the vol buying, and some of the macro liquidity issues,” Karsan asks, acknowledging the pressures linked to asset runoff, Treasury issuances, the diminishing reverse repo, and external events such as the Red Sea attacks, which are perceived as potentially more impactful on supply chains than the global pandemic. In any case, there are increasing prospects of a “February 14 Valentine’s Day Massacre.”

What’s the course of action? According to Simplify Asset Management, considering that far out-of-the-money puts are now priced at half of what they were at the onset of the global pandemic four years ago, hedging at this point is a prudent move. 

Butterflies in the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 present an appealing opportunity. Take, for instance, the 15000/13500/12000 NDX butterfly expiring in the next month or two. It costs between $500 and $1,500 to open. If it’s the shorter-dated one that is in the money today, closing it could yield about a $90,000 credit, excluding changes in implied volatility and the passage of time. The maximum value is $150,000, and the risk is confined to the amount paid at open. Talk about the convexity!

We’ve analyzed this specific trade for you, although in the S&P 500 and without the distant protective put. Given the distinct environment, there is an elevated risk of a volatility increase warranting the acquisition of far-away protection, represented in this instance by the 12000 put.

Graphic: Retrieved from Simplify Asset Management.

Though owning volatility safeguards against a substantial decline, consider the expenses of maintaining that position and the inevitable decline in its value during calm or rising periods. It is “the investment equivalent of death by a thousand cuts.”

“Vol is cheap enough when you go out two or three months, particularly on the call side,” Karsan ends. “Into a rally particularly that should continue to be relatively bid. That doesn’t mean go own one-month vol because that is more uncertain here, right? You will experience a lot of decay if the decline doesn’t happen till February. Right? There is still theta to be had.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Global Research.
Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For May 12, 2023

LOAD LEVELS ON TRADINGVIEW BY CLICKING HERE.

Bloomberg reports that if the US defaults on its debt, which could happen as soon as June 1 if President Biden and House Speaker McCarthy fail to reach a deal on raising the ceiling, homebuyer borrowing costs may surge to 8.40%. As a consequence, the typical home’s monthly payment would increase by 22.00% and cool property sales; the monthly payment on a $500,000.00 mortgage may rise to $3,800.00, compared to about $3,095.00 at the current rate of 6.30%.

Image
Graphic: Retrieved from WSJ.

In prior letters, we concluded that past monetary action made stocks less sensitive to interest rates, quoting JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE: JPM) strategists that the market would likely continue to “artificially suppress perceptions of fundamental macro risks,” barring surprises like a debt limit breach.

US Tech Stocks Outperform | The Nasdaq 100 has soared amid expectations of easier Fed policy
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

With a debt limit breach a potential reality, Moody’s Corporation (NYSE: MCO) says a breach may compound recessionary pressures; expect a drop in equities, a volatility spike, and a disruption of funding markets.

Graphic: Retrieved from Nasdaq Inc (NASDAQ: NDAQ).

“Data show that short-term bonds have the most predictable reaction – with interest rates and default insurance costs rising significantly – before quickly returning to normal after the uncertainty has passed,” Nasdaq’s Phil Mackintosh writes. “In reality, a crisis was averted in all [prior] cases, with the government able to increase or suspend the debt limit before the X Date.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Notwithstanding the short-term uncertainty regarding the debt limit, Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC) is adamant there will be a recession that manifests cracks in “credit and tech,” similar to the situation in 2008. BAC sees the bubble in technology, media, and telecommunication stocks soon deflating as they face higher-for-longer interest rates and a tempered earnings outlook.

Graphic: Retrieved from Societe Generale SA (OTC: SCGLY) via The Market Ear. While investors poured $3.8 billion into technology stocks in the week through May 10, $2.1 billion was pulled from financial equities, the most significant redemption since May 2022.

Compounding the recessionary pressures BAC sees, EPB Research adds, are banks’ funding costs, which have increased too much relative to prevailing asset yields. If the spread drops too low, bank lending tightens, and a recession occurs. Also, other data suggests tightening is finally starting to have an impact. Bloomberg reports that initial claims for unemployment insurance are on the rise. There has been a drop in overall wage growth to 5.1% last month, too, the biggest fall in the rate of increase since the series began.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Separately, breadth divergences are becoming more frequent, with the Daily Advance-Decline (A-D) Line for the NYSE showing lower highs while DJIA and S&P 500 show slightly higher highs, McClellan Financial Publications writes. The bond CEF A-D Line is also showing a bearish divergence, indicating a shift in liquidity that could weigh on other stocks, including the big-cap stocks holding up the SP500 and the Nasdaq 100.

bond cef a-d line
Graphic: Retrieved from McClellan Financial Publications.

McClellan adds that the A-D Line originated from data collected by Leonard Ayres and James Hughes in the 1920s. It was made famous in 1962.

nyse a-d line 1929
Graphic: Retrieved from McClellan Financial Publications.

That’s when Joe Granville and Richard Russell commented on it in their newsletters, noting how it had shown a big bearish divergence ahead of the 1962 bear market.

a-d line 1962
Graphic: Retrieved from McClellan Financial Publications.

To end, the economic calendar next week is focused on manufacturing and housing. The housing market is showing some downside risk for existing-home sales for April due to a weak reading on pending sales, MCO says, adding that housing permits and starts are expected to move sideways as builders remain cautious amid high-interest rates and economic uncertainty. Regional Fed surveys in New York and Philadelphia will provide the first read on factory activity for May, with little hope for a significant rebound in manufacturing. Jobless claims will be critical, as continuing the recent trend would likely signal a rapid deceleration in monthly job gains. Other critical data to be released include retail sales, industrial production, and business inventories.

Should readers wish to hedge the debt ceiling debacle, June call options on the Cboe Volatility Index appear attractive, some suggest. But, with RVOL as low as it is, owning optionality is not generally warranted. The risk is lower lows in volatility.

Image
Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

About

Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest, a soon-to-launch research, consulting, trading, and asset management solutions provider. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for daily updates on the critical contexts that could lend to future market movement.

Separately, please don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.