The Federal Reserve moved the fed funds target rate by 25 basis points to 5-5.25%. They also indicated a likely pause.
“Over the last 30+ years, every time fed funds were raised above the levels of core sticky inflation, policy turned out to be restrictive enough to cool inflationary pressures back to 2% or below,” explained Alfonso Peccatiello. “By summer, core sticky inflation should be trending in the 4% annualized area while fed funds will be sitting at 5% – and history suggests that means the Fed has tightened enough.”
Following a wait-and-see period, which Peccatiello thinks may last about five months, Powell said rates might loosen; measures indicate that financial conditions are tight, leading to predictions of negative economic consequences and cuts.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.
“Chairman Powell’s message remains sobering — the Fed’s policy rates will only come down with a greater economic slowdown or credit crunch from tightening bank lending standards,” said Yung-Yu Ma of BMO Wealth Management. “The equity market has faded in the wake of Chairman Powell’s press conference. The market may be realizing that there’s a fine line between getting the rate cuts it wants and maintaining an economic trajectory that doesn’t invoke buyer’s remorse. A classic case of be careful what you wish for.”
Graphic: Retrieved from Charles Schwab Inc-owned (NYSE: SCHW) thinkorswim platform. Three-Month SOFR Futures (FUTURE: /SR3). Implied interest rate = 100 – future price; the implied interest rate calculated using the 3-month SOFR future is an annualized rate. Based on the shape of the curve, /SR3 trader’s price an easing in the coming months.
Markets closed lower after the Fed’s decision, amid PacWest Bancorp’s (NASDAQ: PACW) examination of strategic options, including a possible sale, confirming that the problem of high bond yields is still around in the banking sector.
“It looks like the markets are moving from one bank to the other, and vulnerable deer in the herd are being kicked off,” Dennis Lockhart, a former Atlanta Fed President, said. “But I would like to believe that Jay Powell has information that suggests that the situation is contained or containable.”
Graphic: Retrieved from Tier1Alpha. Measure suggests traders’ fears and demands to protect/speculate on movement are higher (but restrained) after rate hike, a pressure on underlying markets that could be a catalyst for upside, too, if volatility were to compress/fall again.
As explained in recent letters and our detailed trade structuring report, the markets may trade stronger for longer. However, the risks grow “as recessionary conditions proliferate.” Some, including Andy Constan of Damped Spring Advisors, think a hard landing is 100% a likely outcome over the long term, while, over the short term, our recent letters point to context that may keep markets contained.
As a reminder, there will be only updates to levels tomorrow and Monday. Stay well.
Graphic: Retrieved from Sergei Perfiliev. A persistent spread in realized and implied volatility may contain markets.
About
Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest, a soon-to-launch research, consulting, trading, and asset management solutions provider. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for daily updates on the critical contexts that could lend to future market movement.
Separately, please don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
The S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX) recovered after a violent sell-off led by products like the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (NYSE: KRE). This is before updates on the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) monetary policy today.
Graphic: Retrieved from Danny Kirsch of Piper Sandler Companies (NYSE: PIPR).
The consensus is the Fed ratchets up the target rate to 5.00-5.25%. Following this, it is likely to keep rates at this higher level for longer than markets expect, letting the effects of the tightening work through the economy and tame the still-sticky inflation (e.g., lenders eating the cost of interest to sell more goods, job vacancies dropping, and payrolls surprising higher).
Graphic: Retrieved from Citigroup Inc (NYSE: C) via Bloomberg. “The Fed’s own projections from March suggest rates will be only just above 5% by year’s end — implying a protracted pause with no cuts, after the most aggressive hiking campaign in decades. It’s marked in red in the chart [above].”
Strategists at JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE: JPM) think a “hike and pause” scenario prompts a push higher in stocks.
“Here, the Fed would be relying on a tightening of lending standards stemming from the banking crisis to act as de facto rate hikes. Any language that the market interprets as the Fed being on pause should benefit stocks,” JPM wrote. “This outcome is not fully priced into equities.”
This idea was alluded to in yesterday’s letter; stocks likely do “ok” in a higher rates for longer environment. Beyond economic surprises and the debt ceiling issue, the Fed’s balance sheet (not likely to be addressed in this next announcement) strategists like Andy Constan of Damped Spring Advisors are most concerned about, since the size of quantitative easing or QE made stocks less sensitive to interest rates. Ratcheting quantitative tightening or QT, the flow of capital out of markets, would prompt some increased bearishness among those strategists.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC) via Macro Ops.
JPM strategists add the market may continue “artificially suppress[ing] perceptions of fundamental macro risks,” prompting upside momentum.
“We expect these inflows to persist over the next two weeks, with several more large returns expected to drop from the trailing sample window,” Tier1Alpha explains. “Even if market volatility increases during this time, it would take exceptionally significant moves to trigger substantial selling. While these inflows are advantageous during market upswings, it’s essential to remember that they can be particularly brutal on the way back down once volatility inevitably returns.”
Eventually, “as recessionary conditions proliferate,” EPB’s Eric Basmajian says, asset prices will turn. Downside accelerants include the debt limit breach, which Nasdaq Inc (NASDAQ: NDAQ) and Moody’s Corporation (NYCE: MCO) think portends recession and volatility spike.
Trade ideas and more in our recently published report.
Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest, a soon-to-launch research, consulting, trading, and asset management solutions provider. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for daily updates on the critical contexts that could lend to future market movement.
Separately, please don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
First Republic Bank (NYSE: FRC) is in the news for its failure. FRC was known for handing out mortgages at rock-bottom rates. When interest rates rose, the bank’s book of mortgages was hurt and left it with not enough to suffice withdrawals.
“FRC believed its business model of extraordinary customer service and product pricing would result in superior customer loyalty through all cycles,” wrote Timothy Coffey of Janney Montgomery Scott. “Instead, too many FRC customers showed their true loyalties were to their own fears.”
This “marks the second-biggest bank failure in U.S. history, behind the 2008 collapse of Washington Mutual Inc.,” reports WSJ; after the instability in March, the bank finally succumbed to the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) rate increases and depositor worry.
JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE: JPM) acquired the bulk of FRC’s operations.
Graphic: Retrieved from JPM. See a nice summary by @brandonjcarl.
Further, research shows money is getting tighter, a headwind for the economy, while inflation is sticky and the Fed’s bond holdings are preventing tightening from being effective; WSJ reports the Fed’s balance sheet loaded with bonds may be insulating stocks from interest rate policies.
“Quantitative easing locked the Fed into a position that is difficult to unwind,” said Stephen Miran of Amberwave Partners. Quantitative easing, or QE, made stocks less sensitive to interest rates. “It’s made tightening both slower and less effective than it should have been.”
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg. The Fed’s favorite measure of inflation, the core PCE index, has been consistently stuck around 4-5% since 2022. The employment cost index, which shows wage growth at around 4-5%, is inconsistent with a 2% inflation target.
Not “adjusting balance-sheet policy,” but raising rates to 5.00-5.25% as expected, ‘is akin to “hitting the same nail with a hammer over and over again.’” Therefore, stocks, which are higher alongside surprising economic and earnings data, though risky, can do “ok” for longer, comments Andy Constan of Damped Spring Advisors.
Graphic: Retrieved from CME Group Inc’s (NASDAQ: CME) FedWatch Tool.
The sale of volatility bolsters the stability and emboldens upside bettors, adds JPM’s Marko Kolanovic, who finds “selling of options forces intraday reversion, leaving the market price virtually unchanged many days.”
Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS).
“This, in turn, drives buying of stocks by funds that mechanically increase exposure when volatility declines (e.g., volatility targeting and risk parity funds),” he elaborates. “This market dynamic artificially suppresses perceptions of fundamental macro risks. The low hurdle rate and robust fundamentals bode well for 1Q earnings results, but we advise using any market strength on reporting to reduce exposure.”
At this juncture, yes, stocks can move sideways or higher for a bit longer as a function of “momentum, not value,” Simplify Asset Management’s Michael Green concludes. Traders can position for this and various levels of potential upset later with structures included in a report we published last week.
About
Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest, a soon-to-launch research, consulting, trading, and asset management solutions provider. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for daily updates on the critical contexts that could lend to future market movement.
Separately, please don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest, a soon-to-launch research, consulting, trading, and asset management solutions provider. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for daily updates on the critical contexts that could lend to future market movement.
Tomorrow’s Good Friday, and some markets, including the US’s equity market, will be closed. The Treasury market will remain open, albeit for less time, and may enable traders to price the impacts of coming releases, including non-farm payrolls (NFP). The consensus is that the US added 235,000 jobs in March, with the unemployment rate expected to remain steady at 3.50%. Higher for longer, then? We shall see.
Moreover, the big news is that the trend in mortgage rates, followed closely in the US, continues to be down. US 30-year fixed mortgage rates fell for a fourth-straight week, though applications to buy and refinance a home declined for the first time in a month. However, borrowing costs remain generally high and housing inventory low, keeping a cap on homebuying activity.
Notwithstanding, as explained by Akash Kanojia, for the housing market to “clear” on today’s affordability, home prices need to fall by about 20.00%.
To explain, typically, banks use a debt-to-income ratio to determine how much they will lend to a borrower to buy a house. Adding, they could enforce a limit of 80% on the purchase price of the house, and the remaining 20.00% is paid in cash by the borrower as a down payment.
Mortgage rates comprise the short-term risk-free rate, term premium, the Treasury-MBS spread, the primary-secondary spread, and a credit spread based on the borrower’s creditworthiness. Any of these numbers changing can influence a borrower’s final payment to the lender.
Graphic: Retrieved from Negative Convexity.
An analysis starting with a home price in 2021 of $575,000.00 and a borrower whose income was $92,000.00, and adjusting all for inflation and movements in rates, the decrease in home values to boost affordability is 21.00%.
Graphic: Retrieved from Negative Convexity. “To do this analysis, I started with a home price in April 2021[1]($575,000) and figured out how much annual income a borrower would have needed at that time to buy the house (~$92,000). I then adjusted the annual income up by 8% for 2023, extrapolating from this, resulting in a person that would have earned ~$92,000 earning $99,205 today. Then I calculated how much house a person earning $99,205 can afford today at a mortgage rate of 6.70% ($452,000). Divide the two, and you get a decrease of 21%.”
A worst-case scenario is that the fed funds rate rises further to quell inflation. If the fed funds rate were to rise to 6.00-6.25%, matching the latest annualized CPI print, and “the market realizes the Fed is not going to cut, and the curve (e.g., 3m-7y UST) steepens to historical norms (~150 basis points long-term average), barring changes in the MBS spread, primary-secondary spread, and credit charges, this produces a ~40.00% decline in home prices.
Graphic: Retrieved from Negative Convexity.
Consequently, as the economy slows and layoffs increase, as we’re starting to see, it will negatively affect housing demand and affordability due to income stability and growth. On the bright side, inflation destroys the nominal value of debt, Kanojia says. Assuming wages keep up, buyers in hot markets may be spared if they can withhold from selling at market-clearing prices, Kanojia ends.
On a note about the doom and gloom (i.e., economy slowing and layoffs increasing, as well as yield curve steepening), JPMorgan Chase & Co’s (NYSE: JPM) Jamie Dimon says the following:
Today’s inverted yield curve implies that we are going into a recession. As someone once said, an inverted yield curve like this is ‘eight for eight’ in predicting a recession in the next 12 months. However, it may not be true this time because of the enormous effect of QT. As previously stated, longer-term rates are not necessarily controlled by central banks, and it is possible that the inversion we see today is still driven by prior QE and not the dramatic change in supply and demand that is going to take place in the future.
Dimon, the CEO of JPM, says that a graph showing the yields on bonds of different maturities is inverted, meaning that the yields on shorter-term bonds are higher than the yields on longer-term bonds. An inverted yield curve has often been a reliable indicator of an upcoming recession; it reflects investor demands for higher returns on short-term investments and expectations that short-term rates will fall in the future, which happens when the central bank cuts rates in response to a weak economy.
In other words, the conditions around the yield curve inversion are different this time.
Graphic: Retrieved from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. A normal yield curve is upward-sloping, meaning long-term interest rates are higher than short-term rates; investors demand a higher return for tying up their money for a longer period; the spread between the 10-year and 3-month treasury yield is positive.
Further, a peek at the bond market shows cuts priced within six months.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via @TheBondFreak.
Same thing with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) market, developed by the Federal Reserve to replace LIBOR, which was phased out due to manipulation concerns, among other things, as a benchmark interest rate.
Unlike LIBOR, which is based on unsecured lending transactions between banks, SOFR is based on actual transactions in the overnight repurchase agreement (repo) market, which makes it a more reliable benchmark. Consequently, the shift from the Eurodollar (FUTURE: /GE), used to intervene in support of the dollar and other currencies and allow lenders to lock in rates, to SOFR has accelerated, too.
As stated yesterday, options activity in the SOFR market was centered around the 95.00 strikes. To calculate the implied interest rate using the value of the 3-month SOFR future, we can use the following formula:
Implied interest rate = 100 – future price; the implied interest rate calculated using the 3-month SOFR future is an annualized rate.
For example, if the current value of the 3-month SOFR future is 95.00, the implied interest rate would be 100.00 – 95.00 = 5.00%.
Graphic: Via Charles Schwab Corporation’s (NYSE: SCHW) thinkorswim platform. The three-month SOFR (FUTURE: /SR3) curve implies a 4.86% terminal rate today, followed by easing into year-end.
The S&P 500 (INDEX: SPX) has not bottomed based on these conditions. 3Fourteen Research concludes that the SPX has never bottomed during a Fed hike cycle, which one is still ongoing; typically, forward earnings stabilize and turn higher 3-6 months after a market bottom, which hasn’t happened; the 2-10 yield curve has never remained inverted six months after a major bear market bottom.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via @MichaelMOTTCM.
Notwithstanding all the doom and gloom, we explained in past letters that markets would likely remain strong through month-end March.
Graphic: Retrieved from Damped Spring Advisors’ Andy Constan. “6 of the last 6 quarters, the quarter end flow has resulted in a spike or dip and a subsequent 8%+ reversal.”
Accordingly, it made a lot of sense to own low- or no-cost call options structures in products like the Nasdaq 100 (INDEX: NDX), where many participants were caught offsides and bidding call volatility in response to the dramatic reversal; the reach for the right tail reduced the cost of ratio call spreads, making them the go-to structures.
It may make sense to re-load in similar call structures on pullbacks while using any proceeds or profits from those structures to reduce the cost of owning fixed-risk and less costly put structures (e.g., vertical) that may enable us to participate in equity market downside, as well as bet on lower rates in the future using call options structures on the /SR3 to express that opinion.
Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView via Physik Invest.
Disclaimer
Don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Welcome to the Daily Brief by Physik Invest. Learn about our origin story here, and consider subscribing for free daily updates on the most important market updates.
We keep recent letters brief as a lengthy one is still being written. Thank you for being so patient.
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed a decrease in job vacancies and a tightening of the labor market; vacancies per job-seeker have reduced by 20%, and workers are in a weaker position to bargain.
Accordingly, rate expectations dropped ahead of the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting; traders are bidding up the price of equities.
Graphic: Retrieved from Noura Holdings Inc (NYSE: NMR) via The Market Ear. “Long/short vs SPX rolling returns shows you the pain. Nomura’s quant guru McElligott weighs in: ‘…all of last year’s Equities Alpha was in your ‘Short’ books, which were loaded with ‘Expensive / High Multiple / Low Quality / Un-Profitable’ Growth…but that’s now the stuff that is exploding higher on the violent Rates reset LOWER.”
Federal Reserve President Loretta Mester maintained that the benchmark rate should move and stay above 5% to control inflation, adding that no rate cuts may happen this year, barring a significant change in price pressures. Mester said inflation is on its way out – price growth is likely to drop to 3.75% this year and reach 2% by 2025 – and the banking system is sound, though policymakers are ready to respond to new stresses.
A peek at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or SOFR market shows activity or the consensus centered at the 95.00 options strike (~5%). Per Bloomberg, large positions include a June 95.00/96.00 1×2 call spread, a June 95.75/95.50/95.25/95.00 put condor, and 95.00/94.75/94.50 put flies in both September and December tenors.
From a positioning perspective, this letter maintains the idea of starting to monetizecall structures and rolling profits into fixed-risk bear put spreads. However, given the potential for an underwhelming selloff or “grinding de-leveraging,” keep those debits you pay in check!
To end, the upcoming non-farm payrolls or NFP reportsandinflation figures will provide crucial data on the state of the economy.
Graphic: Retrieved from Damped Spring Advisors’ Andy Constan. “6 of the last 6 quarters, the quarter end flow has resulted in a spike or dip and a subsequent 8%+ reversal.”
Disclaimer
Don’t use this free letter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. At this time, Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements. Separately, you may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Graphic updated 8:00 AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /MES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /MES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. The lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. The CBOE VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX) reflects the attractiveness of owning volatility. UMBS prices via MND. Click here for the economic calendar.
Administrative
Keeping it brief for today. Enjoy your Friday. Be opportunistic and watch your risk.
Positioning
For days prior, top-line measures of implied volatility or IVOL like the Cboe Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX) fell, as did the Cboe VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX), the latter which is a way to gauge the expensiveness of IVOL or convexity. It was, in part, the resolution of a recent liquidity crisis that prompted this to happen. Under the hood, volatility skew told a different story; traders were hedging against tail outcomes.
Even so, this hedging and volatility skew behavior did little to boost the pricing of most spread structures above and below the market we analyzed. The non-stickiness of IVOL into this rally may have been detrimental to the more expensive call options structures, as we expected; hence, our consistent belief that structures should be kept at low- or no-cost.
The environment changed yesterday, however. Both top- and bottom-line measures of IVOL were sticky into equity market strength. This was observed via the pricing of spread structures (e.g., verticals and back- and ratio-spreads) structured above and below the market. The stickiness of volatility seemed to impact most the put side of the market. Some savvy traders may have been able to build spread structures below the market at a lesser cost potentially.
As an aside, some may have observed how well our levels have been working. For instance, as shown below (middle bottom), yesterday’s Daily Brief levels marked the session high and low for the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Index (FUTURE: /MES).
Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView.
Commentators online have rightly pointed out the build-up of short-dated options exposures near current market prices. In short, this activity, and its potential hedging, help promote mean-reversion and responsiveness at our volume profile-derived key levels, which often overlap with centers of significant options activity, as we see. Particularly after the quarterly options expiry (OpEx), this activity’s ability to contain markets will ease; markets will yield to fundamental strengths or weaknesses. Based on top-line measures of breadth and IVOL, “there isn’t much juice left to squeeze,” SpotGamma says. From an options positioning perspective, for volatility to reprice lower and solicit re-hedging that boosts the market, “we need a change in [the] volatility regime (i.e., soft landing, bank crisis resolved, etc.),” SpotGamma adds. The likelihood of that happening is low; some expect the Federal Reserve (Fed) to stick to its original message and continue to tighten and withdraw liquidity. So, blindly selling options (colloquially referred to as volatility) in this environment is dangerous.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg’s Joe Weisenthal.
Damped Spring’s Andy Constan overlays past and present inflation fights. What if?
Graphic: Retrieved from Andy Constan of Damped Spring Advisors.
Technical
As of 8:00 AM ET, Friday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET) in the S&P 500 will likely open in the middle part of a balanced overnight inventory, inside of the prior day’s range, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.
The S&P 500 pivot for today is $4,087.75.
Key levels to the upside include $4,097.25, $4,108.75, and $4,121.25.
Key levels to the downside include $4,077.75, $4,062.25, and $4,049.75.
Disclaimer: Click here to load the updated key levels via the web-based TradingView platform. New links are produced daily. Quoted levels likely hold, barring an exogenous development.
Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures (bottom middle).
About
The author, Renato Leonard Capelj, spends the bulk of his time at Physik Invest, an entity through which he invests and publishes free daily analyses to thousands of subscribers. The analyses offer him and his subscribers a way to stay on the right side of the market.
You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Disclaimer
Do not construe this newsletter as advice; all content is for informational purposes, and derivatives carry a substantial risk of loss. Capelj and Physik Invest, non-professional advisors, will never solicit others for capital or collect fees and disbursements for their work.
Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is a free newsletter sent to thousands of subscribers daily. Intrigued about what moves markets and how that can impact your financial wellness? Subscribe below.
Graphic updated 7:00 AM ET. Sentiment Risk-On if expected /MES open is above the prior day’s range. Click here for the latest levels. /MES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. The lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. The CBOE VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX) reflects the attractiveness of owning volatility. UMBS prices via MND. Click here for the economic calendar.
Administrative
The newsletter format needs to evolve a bit. Feedback is welcomed! If you are looking for the link to the daily chart, see the caption below the graphic above. Take care!
Positioning
Fear of contagion prompted demands for protection. Measures of implied volatility or IVOL rose, and consequently, these demands for protection pressured markets.
Previously, this letter explained for protection to keep its value, there would have to be a shift higher in realized volatility or RVOL. Well, RVOL did not come back in a big way at the index level, as many expected.
Thus, the positive effects of the bank-related stimulation and traders’ pulling forward their timeline for easing were compounded by the unwinding of hedging strategies.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via SpotGamma. “This drop in 5-day realized vol (orange) is pretty sharp, given it occurred from such a low relative level. ‘Can’t short it, don’t want to buy it.’ This vol decline comes as SPX put open interest was cleared with March OPEX, and big VIX call interest expired last week.”
Previously depressed products like the Nasdaq 100 or NDX, which are generally very sensitive to monetary tightening, have performed well.
Graphic: Retrieved from Callum Thomas’ Topdown Charts.
As we near month-end, there is a quarterly derivatives expiry. Above current S&P 500 or SPX levels is a significant concentration of soon-to-roll-off open interest held short by investors. This means the counterparties are dynamically hedging a call they own; they’re selling strength and buying weakness, albeit in a less and less meaningful way, as those options near this expiration and their probability of paying out (i.e., delta or exposure to direction) falls.
Some would allege that volatility compression and time decay would have solicited a more meaningful response from options counterparties at those strike prices above; the absence of downside follow-through had traders supplying previously demanded downside put protection and catalyzing a rally. However, there are not many things for the market to rally on, and so much time has passed that the charm effects (i.e., the impact of time passing on an options delta) have lessened dramatically, some explain.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Liz Young. “The Nasdaq’s Cumulative Advance-Decline line has parted ways with index direction in recent days. In other words, the index has rallied despite weak breadth (more stocks falling than rising), the two lines are likely to find their way back together somehow…”
Therefore, it’s probably likely that the market remains contained through month-end. After, movement may increase. This letter acknowledged RVOL might come back in a big way, particularly with the bank intervention doing more to thwart credit creation.
The caveat is that markets can trade spiritedly for far longer. There is a potential for the markets to move into a far “more combustible” position. With call skews far up meaningfully steep, still-present low- and zero-cost call structures this letter has talked about in the past remain attractive.
Graphic: Retrieved from Charles Schwab Corporation-owned (NYSE: SCHW) thinkorswim.
If the market falls apart, your costs are low, and losses are minimal. If markets move higher into that “more combustible” position, wherein “volatility is sticky into a rally,” you may monetize your call structures and roll some of those profits into bear put spreads (i.e., buy put and sell another at a lower strike).
The signs of a “more combustible situation” would likely show when “volatility is sticky into a rally,” explains Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan. To gauge combustibility, look to the options market.
Remember, calls trade at a lower IVOL than puts. As the market trades higher, it slides to a lower IVOL, reflected by broad IVOL measures. If broad IVOL measures are sticky/bid, “that’s an easy way to say that fixed-strike volatility is coming up and, if that can happen for days, that can unpin volatility and create a situation where dealers themselves are no longer [own] a ton of volatility; they start thinning out on volatility themselves, and that creates a more combustible situation.”
To explain the “thinning out” part of the last paragraph, recall participants often opt to own equity and downside (put) protection financed, in part, with sales of upside (call) protection. More demand for calls will result in counterparties taking on more exposure against movement (i.e., negative gamma) hedged via purchases of the underlying. Once that exposure expires and/or decays, that dealer-based support will be withdrawn. If the assumption is that equity markets are expensive now, then, after another rally, there may be more room to fall, all else equal (a simplistic way to look at this), hence the increased precariousness and combustibility.
Graphic: Retrieved from Callum Thomas’ Topdown charts.
About
The author, Renato Leonard Capelj, spends the bulk of his time at Physik Invest, an entity through which he invests and publishes free daily analyses to thousands of subscribers. The analyses offer him and his subscribers a way to stay on the right side of the market.
You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Disclaimer
Do not construe this newsletter as advice; all content is for informational purposes. Capelj and Physik Invest are non-professional advisors managing their own capital. They will never openly solicit others for capital or manage others’ capital to collect fees and disbursements.
Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read free by thousands of subscribers. Join this community to learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets.
Graphic updated 7:00 AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /MES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /MES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. The lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. The CBOE VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX) reflects the attractiveness of owning volatility. UMBS prices via MND. Click here for the economic calendar.
Administrative
Time for something inspiring! Separate from his work at Physik Invest, founder Renato Leonard Capelj is a journalist interviewing global leaders in business, government, and finance. In his desire to learn and apply the methods of those others who are far more experienced, Capelj has a long list of interviews you may find helpful in strengthening your understanding of markets. Check out some recent ones!
Capelj spoke with Simplify Asset Management’s Michael Green about cutting investors’ portfolio volatility while amplifying profit potential.
In response to uncertainty, Green says investors can park cash in short-term near-risk-free bonds yielding 5% or more, as well as allocate some capital to volatility “to introduce a degree of convexity,” risking only the premium paid. Alternatively, investors can take a more optimistic long view and position in innovations like artificial intelligence or next-generation energy production.
Capelj spoke with The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial about his market perspectives.
Naive measures like the VVIX, which is the volatility of the VIX or the volatility of the S&P 500’s volatility, are printing at levels last seen in 2017, Sidial explains, noting this would suggest “we can get cheap exposure to convexity while a lot of people are worried.”
“Even if inflation continues, the rate at which it rises won’t be the same. Due to this, CTA exposures likely will not perform as well as they did in 2022, and that’s why you may see more opportunities in the volatility space.”
Capelj spoke with Damped Spring Advisors’ Andy Constan about what investors should focus on and how he creates trades that lose him less money.
Constan’s trades are constructed around two- to four-month time horizons and are structured long and short using defined-risk options trades like debit or credit spreads, depending on whether volatility is cheap or expensive.
“I want deltas and leverage. My macro indicators give me an edge on price and in the worst case, the loss is limited to 10%, if everything has to go against me all at once. I can be 100% invested and only risk 10%.”
Capelj spoke with 42 Macro’s Darius Dale about his Wall Street story and perspectives on life and markets.
“We’re tracking at an above-potential level of output in terms of the growth rate of output. We’re also slowing and the pace of that deceleration is likely to pick up steam in the coming quarters.”
By 2023, that process is likely to “catalyze pressure on asset markets through the lens of corporate earnings and valuations you assign to a lower level of growth.”
Floor traders, according to Reznicek, had low capital requirements. As a result, they could put on strategies like the 1×2 ratio — a debit spread with an extra short option — for a low cost.
(See parts 1, 2, and 3 of ShadowTrader’s how-to series on ratio spreads.)
“On the floor, it is either go big or go home,” he chuckled, remarking that ratio spreads were the way of the casino. “You either get rich or they take your house. So, why would you put on any other spread?”
The next big turning point was Jim Dalton, who’s been a member of the Chicago Board of Trade, as well as a member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and senior executive vice president of the CBOE during its formative years.
“I’m still in touch with him on a regular basis and I consider him a friend,” Reznicek said in a discussion on Dalton’s works like Mind Over Markets and Markets in Profile, as well as his use of WindoTrader Market Profile software. “I went to Chicago twice to see him teach live … and I came home from those seminars with five, six, 10 pages of notes. The nuances of profile continue to mold me.”
Capelj spoke with Kai Volatility Advisors’ Cem Karsan about the implications of record valuations and the growth of derivatives markets on policy, the economy, and financial markets.
“It’s not a coincidence that the mid-February to mid-March 2020 downturn literally started the day after February expiration and ended the day of March quarterly expiration. These derivatives are incredibly embedded in how the tail reacts and there’s not enough liquidity, given the leverage, if the Fed were to taper.”
Capelj spoke with The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial to understand how to capitalize on volatility dislocations.
Unlike standard tail-risk funds which systematically buy equity puts, Ambrus’ approach is bespoke, cutting down on negative dynamics like decay with respect to time.
Given dislocations across single stock skew, term structure, and volatility risk premium, Ambrus will position itself in options with less time to maturity, buying protection up to six weeks out.
“The market will underestimate the distribution,” Sidial said in a conversation on Ambrus’ internal models that spot positional imbalances to determine who is off-sides and in what single asset. “We’re buying things that have happened before and we’re looking for it to carry a heavier beta when the sell-off happens.”
So, by analyzing flow, as well as using internal models to assess the probabilities of deleveraging in a risk-off event, Ambrus is able to venture into individual stocks where there may be excess fragility; “I know if stock XYZ goes down five percent, it’s going to go down 10% because this fund needs to deleverage.”
To aid the cost to carry, Ambrus utilizes defined-risk, short-volatility, absolute return strategies.
“I’m basically giving you a free put on the market – with a ton of convexity – with something that offers a payout that’s just more than a regular put,” Sidial summarized. “If the market doesn’t do anything, and we do an amazing job, we’re flat and you made money on all your long-only equity exposure.”
Capelj spoke with The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial about the meme stock debacle of 2021.
“You have distressed debt hedge funds that focus on shorting these types of companies. Melvin Capital is the one that is singled out due to the media, but they aren’t the only ones.”
Market participants added to the crash-up dynamics. Retail investors aggressively bought stock and short-term call options, while institutional investors further took advantage of the momentum and dislocations.
“You have this dynamic in the derivatives market where there is a gamma squeeze when people are buying way far out-of-the-money calls, and dealers reflexively have to hedge off their risk,” Sidial said.
“It causes a cascading reaction, moving the stock price up because dealers are short calls and they have to buy stock when the delta moves a specific way.”
The participation in the stock on the institutional side has not received much attention, he said.
“We’ve noticed that some of the flow is more institutional,” he said in reference to activity on the level two and three order books, which are electronic lists of buy and sell orders for a particular security.
“You have certain prop guys and other hedge funds that understand what’s going on, and they’re trying to take advantage of it, as well.”
This institutional activity disrupted traditional correlations and caused shares of distressed debt assets like GameStop, BlackBerry Ltd, and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc to trade in-line with each other.
“This was not some WallStreetBet user, … if you look at how some of these things were moving premarket, you would see GME drop like 2%, BB’s best bid would drop and AMC’s best bid would drop. That’s an algo.”
The takeaway: although the WallStreetBets crowd is getting most of the blame, institutions are also at fault for the volatility.
Technical
As of 7:00 AM ET, Tuesday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET) in the S&P 500 will likely open in the lower part of a balanced overnight inventory, inside the prior day’s range, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.
The S&P 500 pivot for today is $4,003.25.
Key levels to the upside include $4,026.75, $4,038.75, and $4,049.75.
Key levels to the downside include $3,980.75, $3,955.00, and $3,937.00.
Disclaimer: Click here to load the updated key levels via the web-based TradingView platform. New links are produced daily. Quoted levels likely hold, barring an exogenous development.
Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.
Definitions
Overnight Rally Highs (Lows): Typically, there is a low historical probability associated with overnight rally-highs (lows) ending the upside (downside) discovery process.
Volume Areas: Markets will build on areas of high-volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for some time, this will be identified by a low-volume area (LVNodes). The LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test.
If participants auction and find acceptance in an area of a prior LVNode, then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to the nearest HVNodes for more favorable entry or exit.
POCs: Areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future value tests as they offer favorable entry and exit.
Definitions
Volume Areas: Markets will build on areas of high-volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for some time, this will be identified by a low-volume area (LVNodes). The LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test.
If participants auction and find acceptance in an area of a prior LVNode, then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to the nearest HVNodes for more favorable entry or exit.
About
The author, Renato Leonard Capelj, spends the bulk of his time at Physik Invest, an entity through which he invests and publishes free daily analyses to thousands of subscribers. The analyses offer him and his subscribers a way to stay on the right side of the market.
You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Disclaimer
Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes. Capelj and Physik Invest manage their own capital and will not solicit others for it.
Separate from his work at Physik Invest, founder Renato Leonard Capelj is an accredited journalist interviewing prestigious global leaders in business, government, and finance.
In his desire to learn and apply the methods of those others who are far more experienced, Capelj has a long list of interviews you may find helpful in strengthening your understanding of markets.
Capelj spoke with Simplify Asset Management’s Michael Green about cutting investors’ portfolio volatility while amplifying profit potential.
In response to uncertainty, Green says investors can park cash in short-term near-risk-free bonds yielding 5% or more, as well as allocate some capital to volatility “to introduce a degree of convexity,” risking only the premium paid. Alternatively, investors can take a more optimistic long view and position in innovations like artificial intelligence or next-generation energy production.
Capelj spoke with The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial about his market perspectives.
Naive measures like the VVIX, which is the volatility of the VIX or the volatility of the S&P 500’s volatility, are printing at levels last seen in 2017, Sidial explains, noting this would suggest “we can get cheap exposure to convexity while a lot of people are worried.”
“Even if inflation continues, the rate at which it rises won’t be the same. Due to this, CTA exposures likely will not perform as well as they did in 2022, and that’s why you may see more opportunities in the volatility space.”
Capelj spoke with Damped Spring Advisors’ Andy Constan about what investors should focus on and how he creates trades that lose him less money.
Constan’s trades are constructed around two- to four-month time horizons and are structured long and short using defined-risk options trades like debit or credit spreads, depending on whether volatility is cheap or expensive.
“I want deltas and leverage. My macro indicators give me an edge on price and in the worst case, the loss is limited to 10%, if everything has to go against me all at once. I can be 100% invested and only risk 10%.”
Capelj spoke with 42 Macro’s Darius Dale about his Wall Street story and perspectives on life and markets.
“We’re tracking at an above-potential level of output in terms of the growth rate of output. We’re also slowing and the pace of that deceleration is likely to pick up steam in the coming quarters.”
By 2023, that process is likely to “catalyze pressure on asset markets through the lens of corporate earnings and valuations you assign to a lower level of growth.”
Floor traders, according to Reznicek, had low capital requirements. As a result, they could put on strategies like the 1×2 ratio — a debit spread with an extra short option — for a low cost.
(See parts 1, 2, and 3 of ShadowTrader’s how-to series on ratio spreads.)
“On the floor, it is either go big or go home,” he chuckled, remarking that ratio spreads were the way of the casino. “You either get rich or they take your house. So, why would you put on any other spread?”
The next big turning point was Jim Dalton, who’s been a member of the Chicago Board of Trade, as well as a member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and senior executive vice president of the CBOE during its formative years.
“I’m still in touch with him on a regular basis and I consider him a friend,” Reznicek said in a discussion on Dalton’s works like Mind Over Markets and Markets in Profile, as well as his use of WindoTrader Market Profile software. “I went to Chicago twice to see him teach live … and I came home from those seminars with five, six, 10 pages of notes. The nuances of profile continue to mold me.”
Capelj spoke with Kai Volatility Advisors’ Cem Karsan about the implications of record valuations and the growth of derivatives markets on policy, the economy, and financial markets.
“It’s not a coincidence that the mid-February to mid-March 2020 downturn literally started the day after February expiration and ended the day of March quarterly expiration. These derivatives are incredibly embedded in how the tail reacts and there’s not enough liquidity, given the leverage, if the Fed were to taper.”
Capelj spoke with The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial to understand how to capitalize on volatility dislocations.
Unlike standard tail-risk funds which systematically buy equity puts, Ambrus’ approach is bespoke, cutting down on negative dynamics like decay with respect to time.
Given dislocations across single stock skew, term structure, and volatility risk premium, Ambrus will position itself in options with less time to maturity, buying protection up to six weeks out.
“The market will underestimate the distribution,” Sidial said in a conversation on Ambrus’ internal models that spot positional imbalances to determine who is off-sides and in what single asset. “We’re buying things that have happened before and we’re looking for it to carry a heavier beta when the sell-off happens.”
So, by analyzing flow, as well as using internal models to assess the probabilities of deleveraging in a risk-off event, Ambrus is able to venture into individual stocks where there may be excess fragility; “I know if stock XYZ goes down five percent, it’s going to go down 10% because this fund needs to deleverage.”
To aid the cost to carry, Ambrus utilizes defined-risk, short-volatility, absolute return strategies.
“I’m basically giving you a free put on the market – with a ton of convexity – with something that offers a payout that’s just more than a regular put,” Sidial summarized. “If the market doesn’t do anything, and we do an amazing job, we’re flat and you made money on all your long-only equity exposure.”
Capelj spoke with The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial about the meme stock debacle of 2021.
“You have distressed debt hedge funds that focus on shorting these types of companies. Melvin Capital is the one that is singled out due to the media, but they aren’t the only ones.”
Market participants added to the crash-up dynamics. Retail investors aggressively bought stock and short-term call options, while institutional investors further took advantage of the momentum and dislocations.
“You have this dynamic in the derivatives market where there is a gamma squeeze when people are buying way far out-of-the-money calls, and dealers reflexively have to hedge off their risk,” Sidial said.
“It causes a cascading reaction, moving the stock price up because dealers are short calls and they have to buy stock when the delta moves a specific way.”
The participation in the stock on the institutional side has not received much attention, he said.
“We’ve noticed that some of the flow is more institutional,” he said in reference to activity on the level two and three order books, which are electronic lists of buy and sell orders for a particular security.
“You have certain prop guys and other hedge funds that understand what’s going on, and they’re trying to take advantage of it, as well.”
This institutional activity disrupted traditional correlations and caused shares of distressed debt assets like GameStop, BlackBerry Ltd, and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc to trade in-line with each other.
“This was not some WallStreetBet user, … if you look at how some of these things were moving premarket, you would see GME drop like 2%, BB’s best bid would drop and AMC’s best bid would drop. That’s an algo.”
The takeaway: although the WallStreetBets crowd is getting most of the blame, institutions are also at fault for the volatility.
Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read free by thousands of subscribers. Join this community to learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets.
Graphic updated 8:10 AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /MES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /MES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. The lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. The CBOE VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX) reflects the attractiveness of owning volatility. UMBS prices via MND. Click here for the economic calendar.
Fundamental
As well summarized by Eric Basmajian, inflation, and growth are on a downward trajectory. Most leading indicators “suggest recessionary pressure will be ongoing.” The banking crisis and response, which will ultimately “cause a tightening of lending to the private economy,” likely exacerbates the ongoing recessionary pressures.
Most strategists including the Damped Spring’s Andy Constan agree. In a recent video, Constan detailed the implications of policymakers’ intervention. In short, an asset fire sale was turned into a managed sale, and a reduction in credit creation will tighten financial conditions, slowing the economy and inflation.
“Small banks that are facing deposit outflows will see earnings and margins collapse as their cost of funds surges from 1% or 2% on deposits to 4% or 5% at the Fed funding facility,” Basmajian summarizes, noting that the increase in the Federal Reserve (Fed) balance sheet came from the discount window, new bank funding facilities, and spillover from the FDIC insurance backstop, all of which are not to be confused with quantitative easing or QE (i.e., monetary stimulus and a flow of capital into capital markets).
Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of American Corporation (NYSE: BAC) via The Market Ear.
“As deposits leave regional and smaller banks for more yield and safety, they will flow into bigger banks that do less lending or into money market funds that don’t drive credit creation.” Consequently, there will be “a significant tightening of lending standards, and a credit crunch on the private economy as regional and smaller banks face massive funding pressure.”
Graphic: Retrieved from Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) via The Market Ear. “MS models show that a permanent +10pt tightening in lending standards for C&I loans leads to a 35bps rise in the unemployment rate over the next two years. Historically, recessions have arrived more than half a year after jobless claims begin a sustained rise.”
Traders are conflicted about the Fed’s coming interest rate decision. Many were expecting a couple more hikes of at least 25 basis points in size. However, following the recent bank turmoil in the US and abroad, it appears that traders think it will be one additional 25 basis point hike before rate cuts ensue in mid-2023.
Graphic: Retrieved from CME Group Inc’s (NASDAQ: CME) FedWatch Tool.
Historically, selling markets on the last Fed rate hike is a good strategy, Bank of America found.
Graphic: Retrieved from Bank of American Corporation (NYSE: BAC) via The Market Ear.
Positioning
Top-line measures of implied volatility or IVOL including the Cboe Volatility Index or VIX are higher heading into Monday’s trade.
Macro uncertainties have some frightened, hence “equity volatility present[ing] itself in a much stronger way,” said The Ambrus Group’s Kris Sidial. For this equity volatility (i.e., implied volatility or IVOL) to continue performing well, realized volatility or RVOL (i.e., the movement that actually happens and is not implied by traders’ supply and demand of options) must shift and stay higher as well (note: in many ways RVOL and IVOL reinforce the other during extreme greed or fear events.
Though big options expiries (OpEx) “may help unpin the market” and manifest market downside and follow-through in RVOL needed to keep IVOL performing, the window for this to happen may be closing.
The monetization of profitable options structures, as well as volatility compression and options decay, may result in counterparties buying back their short stock and/or futures hedges (to the short put positions they have on), thus boosting the market (particularly the depressed and rate-sensitive Nasdaq 100).
If the market rallies, that has the potential to “make things hotter” in the economy, explained Kai Volatility’s Cem Karsan, which emboldens policymakers to make and keep policy tighter. So, barring follow-through to the downside, any equity market upside that arises is likely limited, as a disclaimer, some think.
Apologies for rushing this section, today. More on positioning in the coming letters.
Technical
As of 8:10 AM ET, Monday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET), in the S&P 500, is likely to open in the middle part of a negatively skewed overnight inventory, inside of the prior day’s range, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.
The S&P 500 pivot for today is $3,946.75.
Key levels to the upside include $3,970.75, $3,994.25, and $4,026.75.
Key levels to the downside include $3,912.25, $3,891.00, and $3,868.25.
Disclaimer: Click here to load the updated key levels via the web-based TradingView platform. New links are produced daily. Quoted levels likely hold barring an exogenous development.
Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 (FUTURE: /MES) bottom-middle.
Definitions
Volume Areas: Markets will build on areas of high-volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for a period of time, this will be identified by a low-volume area (LVNodes). The LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test.
If participants auction and find acceptance in an area of a prior LVNode, then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to the nearest HVNodes for more favorable entry or exit.
POCs: Areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.
About
The author, Renato Leonard Capelj, spends the bulk of his time at Physik Invest, an entity through which he invests and publishes free daily analyses to thousands of subscribers. The analyses offer him and his subscribers a way to stay on the right side of the market.
You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.
Disclaimer
Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes. Capelj and Physik Invest manage their own capital and will not solicit others for it.
