Categories
Commentary

Rehab

“There’s no put; the Trump call on the upside is, if we have good policies, then the markets will go up.” – Secretary Scott Bessent

Macroeconomic Context: ‘A Detox Period’

Economic and (geo)political uncertainty intersect with broader forces as the S&P 500 adjusts to positioning and liquidity realities.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

Leading up to the recent decline, market breadth (measuring how many stocks participate in a market move) had weakened. While a handful of dominant stocks masked the weakness, the underlying market was thinning out. Such dispersion [1] [2] [3], where some stocks surge while others lag, can create an illusion of stability in some market environments.

At the same time, liquidity—cash and credit availability—steadily drained from the system. Mechanisms like the reverse repo facility (where banks park excess cash with the Federal Reserve), the Treasury General Account (the government’s cash balance), and money market flows help offset [1] shortfalls. However, this time, they offered little cushion.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bianco Research.

New policies—such as tariffs and trade restrictions—reinforce market trends and drive investors toward safer assets like bonds. There is a growing preference for lower bond yields over short-term stock market gains.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

While the Federal Reserve controls short-term interest rates, long-term rates are more influenced by broader factors such as inflation expectations, economic growth, and investor sentiment.

Although lower long-term rates can support risk assets, their more immediate and significant impact is on the broader economy. Lowering them reduces borrowing costs for homeowners and businesses, encouraging investment and consumption. Additionally, lowering these yields helps with servicing government debt burdens and improving fiscal stability.

The shifts are intentional. Policymakers are transitioning the economy from dependence on government stimulus, but this adjustment comes with growing pains. Policy narratives and actions may weaken markets and slow economic activity in the short term. One reason receiving attention is the wealth effect—wealthier households, who drive a significant share of consumer spending, tend to spend more when stocks rise. Conversely, market drops can curb this effect and feed an economic slowdown.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via @amitisinvesting.

Positioning Context: Setting Up For A Rip

History doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes. Today’s setup echoes late summer 2024, albeit without the sharp volatility repricing. The difference? This time, investors were prepared, with hedges to act as insurance against market turmoil. The selling has been orderly, creating an illusion of stability and sustaining optimism.

Graphic: Retrieved from JPMorgan Chase via @Marlin_Capital.

This ongoing decline began in mid-February, coinciding with the unwinding of significant amounts of call options—contracts to buy stocks at a set price. This added indirect pressure on the market through hedging-related flows.

SpotGamma expresses this view, highlighting that the February expiration was “call-weighted” due to strong stock performance leading up to it. This increased the likelihood of a pullback, as call sellers unwound their long stock hedges—a simplified explanation, as other offsetting positions may also be in play.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

At the same time, after market shocks in August and December 2024, investors focused more on guarding against sudden volatility spikes rather than hedging against a broader market downturn. This pattern is familiar—the S&P 500 and the Cboe Volatility Index (VIX), which measures expected market volatility, sometimes rise together ahead of market peaks.

Graphic: Retrieved from @AndrewThrasher.

Meanwhile, within market supply dynamics, this activity has effectively set a floor under VIX pricing, as reflected in the VVIX trending higher since the volatility of late last summer.

Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView.

The result? Despite preparations for increased volatility, it hasn’t materialized, frustrating hedge holders and making it harder to identify a market bottom typically marked by extreme volatility spikes. Even with a backwardated implied volatility term structure (where short-term volatility is priced higher than longer-term volatility), anxiety and market movements remain out of sync.

Graphic: Retrieved from TradingView. 1-month VIX less 3-month VIX.

Over time, some traders might shift to longer-dated options, while others might drop their hedges altogether, which could amplify volatility-selling behavior. Ironically, this could create the conditions for shocks they were trying to hedge against.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

Given this environment, 2022’s playbook becomes relevant. Back then, investors—rattled by the COVID crash—were prepared, monetizing hedges into declines and keeping a lid on volatility. We may see parallels now. After last week’s economic data, hedgers have been supplying volatility back to the market, offering brief relief as we potentially enter a seasonally stronger period.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma.

The main takeaway? Current positioning dynamics indicate that investors have effectively managed and responded to the downside. While markets will be volatile, significant shocks may be delayed or avoided.

Graphic: Retrieved from SpotGamma and for illustrative purposes only. SPX prices X-axis. Option delta Y-axis. When the factors of implied volatility (Vanna) and time change (Charm), hedging ratios change. If investors hedge by selling stock to offset long put options, falling implied volatility (as seen in the skew chart above) leads them to buy back the stock, which can support markets.

Context Applied: Trade Structuring

We adapted previously shared structuring guides. Given volatility’s failure to perform, we opted for downside ratios and flies. This worked, and we plan on developing some case studies.

A potential cyclical rebound within a broader period of weakness could be expressed via low-cost positive-delta (bullish) structures, including buying calls while proportionately hedging with stocks or futures, where potential gains from the calls can outweigh hedge-related losses. Additionally, as we prefer, one can deploy verticals and flies, buying options closer to the current market prices while selling more options further out (with an extra far-out option bought to reduce margin requirements if needed).

Graphic: Retrieved from @dailychartbook.

We and others agree that the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) and higher beta stocks are appealing. For one, relative strength pockets emerge in the NDX versus the SPX, potentially attributable to tariffs disproportionately impacting non-tech sectors. Checking options skews, and NDX options farther away in price may be underpriced for the eventually realized volatility.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg via Nicholas Smith.

For more on structuring across different products, be they gold or Bitcoin, see our Mar-a-Lago Accords letter published last month.


Disclaimer

By viewing our content, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions outlined in this disclaimer. Consume our content only if you agree to the terms and conditions below.

Physik Invest is not registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission or any other securities regulatory authority. Our content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or other investment. The information provided is not tailored to your financial situation or investment objectives.

We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any information. Please do not rely solely on our content to make investment decisions or undertake any investment strategy. Trading is risky, and investors can lose all or more than their initial investment. Hypothetical performance results have limitations and may not reflect actual trading results. Other factors related to the markets and specific trading programs can adversely affect actual trading results. We recommend seeking independent financial advice from a licensed professional before making investment decisions.

We don’t make any claims, representations, or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information we provide. We are not liable for any loss or damage caused by reliance on any information we provide. We are not liable for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or damages from the information provided. We do not have a professional relationship with you and are not your financial advisor. We do not provide personalized investment advice.

Our content is provided without warranties, is the property of our company, and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. You may not be able to reproduce, distribute, or use any content provided through our services without our prior written consent. Please email renato@physikinvest for consent.

We reserve the right to modify these terms and conditions at any time. Following any such modification, your continued consumption of our content means you accept the modified terms. This disclaimer is governed by the laws of the jurisdiction in which our company is located.

Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For March 24, 2023

Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read free by thousands of subscribers. Join this community to learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets.

Graphic updated 9:20 AM ET. Sentiment Risk-Off if expected /MES open is below the prior day’s range. /MES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. The lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. The CBOE VIX Volatility Index (INDEX: VVIX) reflects the attractiveness of owning volatility. UMBS prices via MNDClick here for the economic calendar.

Fundamental

Our Daily Brief for 3/23 discussed reactions to the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) interest rate decision being countered by Treasury secretary Janet Yellen’s deposit guarantee comments. Accordingly, doom and gloom are in full bloom prompting Yellen to walk back her toughness and tell lawmakers that regulators would protect the banking system if warranted. However, this did little to assuage markets, hence the neutral-to-risk-off sentiment this morning.

Based on the Fed’s Overnight Reverse Repo (RRP) and Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), as well as money-market flows, strategists believe the deposit flight has not stabilized. To explain, policymakers intervened on the heels of the banking crisis in a way that’s not to be confused with quantitative easing or QE (i.e., flow of capital into markets). The Fed’s balance sheet swelled (from the discount window, the new bank funding facilities, and spillover from the FDIC insurance backstop). The balance sheet has continued to swell while money market funds and the RRP facility see big inflows.

Strategists like Andreas Steno Larsen allege that the maturity of 3-month T-bills and deposit flights partly drives this swell.

Graphic: Retrieved from ZeroHedge.

Rather than being used to boost liquidity (i.e., “lend or to finance trading activities,” as discussed in previous letters, including 9/20), reserves are being sterilized. “The Fed’s actions to stem the banking crisis are beginning to accelerate the effects of [quantitative tightening or] QT, causing money velocity to drop and intensifying the tightening of financial conditions,” Bloomberg’s Simon White reports. “In the coming weeks and months, we are likely to see reserves leaving the high-velocity world of smaller banks, where they were being lent out more, to the effectively zero-velocity black-hole of” money-market funds and RRP.

Graphic: Retrieved from ZeroHedge.

JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE: JPM) validates this view. They think the Fed’s rate hikes and QT have coincided with funds going to money-market funds and larger banks. They add that the banking crisis has accelerated this movement.

Graphic: Retrieved from Bloomberg.

“Deposit movements could cause banks to be cautious on lending, with mid- and small-size banks playing a large role in US lending,” thus exacerbating recessionary pressures, they note. Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC) strategists add that investors should sell equities after the last rate hike to sidestep “the biggest declines.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS).

Positioning

Brief positioning update.

As proposed in previous letters, low- or zero-cost call options structures have worked and may continue to work.

Notwithstanding, look for opportunities to play the downside as markets trade higher into a “more combustible” position. Attractive bear put spread trades are showing in the previously depressed Nasdaq 100, where boosts have, in part, been the result of “volatility compression and options decay.” If you’re participating in the Nasdaq, at least you have breadth on your side.

Graphic: Retrieved from ZeroHedge.

Technical

As of 9:20 AM ET, Friday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET) in the S&P 500 will likely open in the lower part of a negatively skewed overnight inventory, outside of the prior day’s range, suggesting a potential for immediate directional opportunity.

The S&P 500 pivot for today is $3,957.25. 

Key levels to the upside include $3,980.75, $3,994.25, and $4,005.00.

Key levels to the downside include $3,937.00, $3,921.25, and $3,891.00.

Disclaimer: Click here to load the updated key levels via the web-based TradingView platform. New links are produced daily. Quoted levels likely hold, barring an exogenous development.

Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.

Definitions

Overnight Rally Highs (Lows): Typically, there is a low historical probability associated with overnight rally-highs (lows) ending the upside (downside) discovery process.

Volume Areas: Markets will build on areas of high-volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for some time, this will be identified by a low-volume area (LVNodes). The LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test.

If participants auction and find acceptance in an area of a prior LVNode, then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to the nearest HVNodes for more favorable entry or exit.

POCs: Areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future value tests as they offer favorable entry and exit.


About

The author, Renato Leonard Capelj, spends the bulk of his time at Physik Invest, an entity through which he invests and publishes free daily analyses to thousands of subscribers. The analyses offer him and his subscribers a way to stay on the right side of the market. 

Separately, Capelj is an accredited journalist with past works including interviews with investor Kevin O’Leary, ARK Invest’s Catherine Wood, FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, Lithuania’s Minister of Economy and Innovation Aušrinė Armonaitė, former Cisco chairman and CEO John Chambers, and persons at the Clinton Global Initiative.

Connect

Direct queries to renato@physikinvest.com. Find Physik Invest on TwitterLinkedInFacebook, and Instagram. Find Capelj on TwitterLinkedIn, and Instagram. Only follow the verified profiles.

Calendar

You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.

Disclaimer

Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes. Capelj and Physik Invest manage their own capital and will not solicit others for it.

Categories
Commentary

Daily Brief For December 20, 2022

Physik Invest’s Daily Brief is read by thousands of subscribers. You, too, can join this community to learn about the fundamental and technical drivers of markets.

Graphic updated 9:45 AM ET AM ET. Sentiment Neutral if expected /ES open is inside of the prior day’s range. /ES levels are derived from the profile graphic at the bottom of this letter. Levels may have changed since initially quoted; click here for the latest levels. SqueezeMetrics Dark Pool Index (DIX) and Gamma (GEX) with the latter calculated based on where the prior day’s reading falls with respect to the MAX and MIN of all occurrences available. A higher DIX is bullish. At the same time, the lower the GEX, the more (expected) volatility. Click to learn the implications of volatility, direction, and moneyness. Breadth reflects a reading of the prior day’s NYSE Advance/Decline indicator. VIX reflects a current reading of the CBOE Volatility Index (INDEX: VIX) from 0-100.

Fundamental

In a well-put statement by Tier1Alpha, “2022 was not a ‘classic’ bear market accompanying an earnings recession and economic slowdown, but rather a ‘rebalancing channel’ bear market.”

Essentially, as the Federal Reserve (Fed) raises interest rates and bond prices fall, equities are sold and “a ‘bear market’ occurs due to portfolio rebalancing,” as Michael Green well explained in a recent interview.

Graphic: Retrieved from Ned Davis Research via Bloomberg.

Further, some of the most sensitive (beaten) stocks have been in the technology and innovation sectors and, according to one article by Bloomberg’s John Authers, that’s not surprising.

Graphic: ARK Innovation ETF (NYSE: ARKK) via TradingView.

“These companies are prone to fears of rising interest rates, especially since many of them are valued based on their projected profits far into the future. As the Federal Reserve presses on with its most aggressive tightening of monetary policy in decades, the future profits of tech firms will be worth far less at these higher interest rates. And with recession calls growing louder, it might just spell more trouble ahead for these firms.”

Moving on, given the rule of thumb – “past inflation spikes have never been vanquished until the federal funds rate exceeds the inflation rate” – in the realm of possibilities is a “crash … signaling to the Fed that they have raised rates enough.”

Likewise, per an article by Andreas Steno Larsen making the case for a comeback in deflation, equities have yet to price the negative EPS growth we’re likely to see.

Graphic: Retrieved from Andreas Steno Larsen.

“Those who find a lower inflation print a good opportunity to buy risk assets should look away now,” Steno Larsen said. “Remember that the PPI (and the CPI for that matter) is a leading indicator for EPS … if we allow the oil future to predict PPI, then we are in for negative EPS.”

Graphic: Retrieved from Academy Securities’ Peter Tchir via Bloomberg.

Adding, Steno Larsen is in the camp that thinks “the 1970s playbook is intact.” When “the disinflation in goods spills over to services through the spring of 2023, … the Fed will pivot,” he explained.

Graphic: Retrieved from Andreas Steno Larsen.

Some come off as less pessimistic, though. The Fed is to ease sooner than expected; quantitative tightening (QT) is not likely to run its course, Joseph Wang said.

To explain, “an ideal QT would drain liquidity in the overall financial system while keeping liquidity in the banking sector above a minimum threshold. That is only possible if the bulk of the liquidity drained is sourced from the $2T RRP, which holds funds owned by money market funds. MMFs could facilitate QT by withdrawing funds from the RRP to invest in the growing supply of Treasury bills, but recent data suggests they have lost interest in bills. Households [which include hedge funds] appear to have replaced MMFs as the marginal buyer of bills and are funding their purchases out of funds held in the banking sector. This suggests QT may lower banking sector liquidity below the Fed’s comfort level much earlier than anticipated.”

Hence, the downside that has yet to happen may prove not to be as material. A potential consequence, as Steno Larsen sees, is “double inflation,” bolstered by inflationary deglobalization trends that may accelerate.

For equities, “a revisit of the $3,500.00-$3,600.00 zone should be on the cards for S&P 500,” he said, while other markets, like housing, may see drawdowns reaching “15-20%” in the base case.

We’ll go into more depth on certain points next week. Hope this was a great way to set the stage for future conversations.

Technical

As of 9:25 AM ET, Tuesday’s regular session (9:30 AM – 4:00 PM ET), in the S&P 500, is likely to open in the upper part of a negatively skewed overnight inventory, inside of prior-range and -value, suggesting a limited potential for immediate directional opportunity.

Our S&P 500 pivot for today is $3,838.25. 

Key levels to the upside include $3,857.00, $3,867.75, and $3,893.75. 

Key levels to the downside include $3,813.25, $3,793.25, and $3,776.75.

Click here to load today’s key levels into the web-based TradingView platform. All levels are derived using the 65-minute timeframe. New links are produced, daily.

Graphic: 65-minute profile chart of the Micro E-mini S&P 500 Futures.

Definitions

Volume Areas: Markets will build on areas of high-volume (HVNodes). Should the market trend for long periods of time, it will be identified by low-volume areas (LVNodes). LVNodes denote directional conviction and ought to offer support on any test.

If participants auction and find acceptance in an area of a prior LVNode, then future discovery ought to be volatile and quick as participants look to HVNodes for favorable entry or exit.

POCs: Denote areas where two-sided trade was most prevalent in a prior day session. Participants will respond to future tests of value as they offer favorable entry and exit.


About

In short, an economics graduate working in finance and journalism.

Capelj spends most of his time as the founder of Physik Invest through which he invests and publishes daily analyses to subscribers, some of whom represent well-known institutions.

Separately, Capelj is an equity options analyst at SpotGamma and an accredited journalist interviewing global leaders in business, government, and finance.

Past works include conversations with investor Kevin O’Leary, ARK Invest’s Catherine Wood, FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried, Lithuania’s Minister of Economy and Innovation Aušrinė Armonaitė, former Cisco chairman and CEO John Chambers, and persons at the Clinton Global Initiative.

Contact

Direct queries to renato@physikinvest.com or Renato Capelj#8625 on Discord.

Calendar

You may view this letter’s content calendar at this link.

Disclaimer

Do not construe this newsletter as advice. All content is for informational purposes.